2001
DOI: 10.1002/j.1556-6676.2001.tb01959.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The State of Community Counseling: A Survey of Directors of CACREP‐Accredited Programs

Abstract: Directors of CACREP-accredited community counseling programs were surveyed on plans for their programs, needed curricular changes, professional organization and publications desired, and what makes community counseling distinct as a counseling specialization. Respondents were evenly divided between those who seem to see community counseling as generic counselor preparation for nonschool settings and those who seem to see it as a community-oriented specialization in its own right. This division of opinion sugge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The split between Community Counseling and Mental Health Counseling standards affected the counseling profession's ability to view itself as one discipline. It sparked a decade of debates nationwide regarding what differentiated community counseling from mental health counseling (Cowger, Hinkle, DeRidder, & Erk, 1991; Hershenson & Berger, 2001; Wilcoxon, 1990) and further complicated the profession's ability to define a single identity for its members. Furthermore, it created a two‐tiered system of educational training standards, because graduation from an accredited mental health counseling program required more hours of education and 300 additional hours of clinical internship than did programs preparing graduates to work at schools, colleges, or other community‐based settings.…”
Section: The Role Of Standards Revision In the Evolution Of Specialtymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The split between Community Counseling and Mental Health Counseling standards affected the counseling profession's ability to view itself as one discipline. It sparked a decade of debates nationwide regarding what differentiated community counseling from mental health counseling (Cowger, Hinkle, DeRidder, & Erk, 1991; Hershenson & Berger, 2001; Wilcoxon, 1990) and further complicated the profession's ability to define a single identity for its members. Furthermore, it created a two‐tiered system of educational training standards, because graduation from an accredited mental health counseling program required more hours of education and 300 additional hours of clinical internship than did programs preparing graduates to work at schools, colleges, or other community‐based settings.…”
Section: The Role Of Standards Revision In the Evolution Of Specialtymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Questions were constructed from a review of related literature (Hershenson & Berger, 2001;Vacc, 1985;Zimpfer, Cox, West, Bubenzer, & Brooks, 1997) and refined following review and subsequent feedback from four counselor educators with substance abuse counseling and CACREP expertise. Areas of inquiry included: (a) type of accredited programs of study offered, (b) number and type of substance abuse counseling course(s) offered, (c) whether a substance abuse emphasis within community counseling program was offered, (d) percentage of substance abuse counseling field placements, and (e) importance of establishing CACREP preparation standards for substance abuse counseling.…”
Section: Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Buelow, Hebert, and Buelow (2000) declared "Knowledge of the use of psychiatric medications is clearly becoming a necessary step in the development of the science and art of psychotherapy" (p. 2), many counselors are not receiving adequate master's-level training in psychopharmacology. Hershenson and Berger (2001) surveyed directors of Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs (CACREP)-accredited community counseling programs on their plans for changes in curricula. Although 20% of respondents planned to add one or two courses to their curricula during the next 5 years, less than 6% of respondents recommended course work in psychopharmacology.…”
Section: Assessing the Status Quomentioning
confidence: 99%