Bringing the State Back In 1985
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511628283.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The State and Economic Transformation: Toward an Analysis of the Conditions Underlying Effective Intervention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
77
0
12

Year Published

1990
1990
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 266 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
77
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…The two leaders of the Park administration, President Park Chung Hee and Prime Minister Kim Chong Pil (former Lieutenant Colonel who assisted Park in the 1961 military coup), had no ties to the elites (Koo 1987). Thus, the state's capacity and autonomy, which are the two key elements of state's effectiveness, were both enhanced in the aftermath of the military coup in the Park administration (Rueschemeyer and Evans 1985). The Illicit Wealth Accumulation Charges were a prime example of how the Park administration tamed private businesses into a working relationship with the government.…”
Section: The Developmental Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two leaders of the Park administration, President Park Chung Hee and Prime Minister Kim Chong Pil (former Lieutenant Colonel who assisted Park in the 1961 military coup), had no ties to the elites (Koo 1987). Thus, the state's capacity and autonomy, which are the two key elements of state's effectiveness, were both enhanced in the aftermath of the military coup in the Park administration (Rueschemeyer and Evans 1985). The Illicit Wealth Accumulation Charges were a prime example of how the Park administration tamed private businesses into a working relationship with the government.…”
Section: The Developmental Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 The idea of autonomy may therefore be useful insofar as we can talk of the autonomy of particular arms of the state vis-à-vis particular groups and in relation to specific goals. The degree to which different state organizations are or are not constrained by social groups on whom they depend for resources, legitimacy, or votes is likely to matter for state effectiveness.…”
Section: What Causesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The connection of the bureaucratic foundations and functions between different institutional settings (Rueschemeyer and Evans, 1985) of the welfare system and the relationships of social capital as a moral appeal, trust and cultural mechanisms define and reinforce the status borders of the beneficiary groups of social policy. However, conservatives relate the state with society in a zero-sum game, while the institutions of civil society earn what the state loses.…”
Section: Institutions Of Social Policymentioning
confidence: 99%