The State and Civil Society: Transition and Prospects of Labour Geographies in an Era of Economic Globalisation in Nigeria and South Africa

Abstract

This paper seeks to provide a comparative analysis of the role of labour movements in democratisation during two very different political transitions in Nigeria and South Africa and in the context of globalisation and neoliberal hegemony. First, Nigeria is examined as an example of authoritarian rollback and containment of pro-democracy movements in an economy heavily conditioned by interventions from the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. Second, South Africa is discussed as a case of home-grown structural adjustment or gradual neoliberal shift in macroeconomic policies without relevant external interventions. The paper compares the failure of past Nigerian democratisation with the problems and issues arising after the first successful democratic electoral change in South Africa. Labour is analysed by focusing on its relationships with a set of organisations, institutions and regulated behaviours, and the broader concept of labour movement in its plurality of forms of identity, militancy and organisation. The argument of this paper is that the neoliberal discourse, with or without overt political authoritarianism, involves a narrowing of spaces for institutionalising the progressive role of labour in civil society. In the Nigerian case, this process leads to grassroots' demand for a significant radicalisation of trade union strategies, while the possibilities and constraints for such an outcome in the South African case are explored in relation to the crisis of corporatist solutions. The paper concludes that the impact of labour is the single most important factor in the establishment of democracy through alliance with other social forces. At the same time, this conclusion cautions with the contradictory nature of pressures placed on organised labour. relative importance of material inputs in production in advanced industrialised countries, this factor has resulted in the decreased importance of primary resources in economic production. Industries have tended to shift from labour-intensive to knowledgeor capital-intensive modes. Second, there has been the rise of transnational capital as an

Historical Perspective of Industrial Relationship in Nigeria

“…In the face of these challenges, Nigeria must also reconcile global labour standards with its local socio-economic realities (Lado, 2000). The country is a signatory to various international labour conventions that set standards for fair labour practices.…”

Neoliberalism, Corporations, and Power: Enron in India

“…In Zimbabwe, the textile, clothing, and footwear industries virtually collapsed following the adoption of the World Bank's recommendations vis-à-vis economic liberalization and structural adjustment (Carmody 1998), and the urban poor have been badly affected by the retreat of the state from welfare subsidies, resulting in sharp increases in food prices (Drakakis-Smith 1994). Similarly, neoliberalism has had negative impacts, ranging from environmental degradation to growth of political authoritarianism in Cambodia (Springer 2009), southern Mexico (Klepeis and Vance 2003), island countries in the Pacific (Murray 2000), Nigeria (Lado 2000), South Africa (Lado 2000;Peet 2002), Ghana (Logan and Mengisteab 1993), and Somalia (Samatar 1993). Geographers, however, have severely neglected the unfolding and impact of neoliberalism in India.…”

Remarkable returns: the influence of a labour-led socio-economic rights movement on legislative reasoning, process and action in Nigeria, 1999–2007

“…Although the origins of labour unionism in Nigeria have been dated to the 1940s (Lado 2000: 299), the NLC was founded only in 1978, when the four separate central labour organisations that then existed in Nigeria were unified under a single tent. It is currently composed of twenty-nine labour unions (NLC Profile 2008: 1; Aina 1990: 39), and organised around thirty-seven state councils and a number of central organs, the most important of which for our purposes is its National Executive Council (NEC) (Informant 1 2004 int.).…”