Tragedy, Euripides and Euripideans 2007
DOI: 10.5949/liverpool/9781904675730.003.0010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Stasimon Euripides, Hecuba 905–52

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(tr. Collard (1991) adapted)Both Janko and Bremmer noted the verbal similarities but did not explore the importance of the context. There are several points of contact.…”
Section: The Hecuba Of Euripides and Carcinusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(tr. Collard (1991) adapted)Both Janko and Bremmer noted the verbal similarities but did not explore the importance of the context. There are several points of contact.…”
Section: The Hecuba Of Euripides and Carcinusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the extant scenes of Greek drama that feature the return of a dead person from the underworld, namely the appearance of the ghost of Dareios in Aeschylus' Persians and that of the ghost of Polydoros in Euripides' Hekabe, there is no indication that the ekkyklema was ever used. Most commentators hold the view that Polydoros appeared on the skene roof, 43 whereas the staging of the appearance of the ghost of Dareios at Aeschylus' Persians 681 is far from certain. 44 Greek literature often describes death as the approaching of the 'gates of Hades', 45 ancient Greeks therefore pictured the underworld as an enclosed not beset by the Erinyes would anticlimactically dispel the tension created by the Pythia's description of the scene within the temple.'…”
Section: Staging the Arrival Of The Fourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 88 For a summary of the solutions for Clytemnestra's entry in Eumenides, see Sommerstein (1989) 100–1; Podlecki (1989) 136; Mitchell-Boyask (2009) 51–2. For Polydorus' apparition, see Mastronarde (1990) 276; Mossman (1995) 50–1; Collard (1991) 130; Gregory (1999) 46; Brillante (1988) 434; Jouanna (1982) 51–2, all of whom support the roof theory, with use of crane possible; see, however, Hickman (1938) 53–4; Hourmouziades (1965) 159–60; and, more recently, Lane (2007), Matthiessen (2010) 261 and Scodel (2012) 59 and 185, who support use of the ground level. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%