Coling 2008: Proceedings of the Workshop on Cross-Framework and Cross-Domain Parser Evaluation - CrossParser '08 2008
DOI: 10.3115/1608858.1608859
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Stanford typed dependencies representation

Abstract: This paper examines the Stanford typed dependencies representation, which was designed to provide a straightforward description of grammatical relations for any user who could benefit from automatic text understanding. For such purposes, we argue that dependency schemes must follow a simple design and provide semantically contentful information, as well as offer an automatic procedure to extract the relations. We consider the underlying design principles of the Stanford scheme from this perspective, and compar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
621
0
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 752 publications
(650 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
621
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The rules in the system are defined based on dependency structures [23]; in Table 4 several of these rules are illustrated in text.…”
Section: The Biutee Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rules in the system are defined based on dependency structures [23]; in Table 4 several of these rules are illustrated in text.…”
Section: The Biutee Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To identify simple sentences from the input text we have taken the help of openly available Stanford Parser 1 and Stanford CoreNLP 2 along with the help of Stanford Typed Dependency Manual (Marneffe & Manning, 2008). The Stanford Parser provides the dependency parsing of an input sentence and Stanford Deterministic Co-reference Resolution System which is a module of CoreNLP Suit helps us to solve the co-reference problem.…”
Section: Simple Sentence Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a sentence contains more than one nsubj or nsubjpass then it is considered as compound or complex. The nsubj and nsubjpass are categorized as subject according to Stanford Typed Dependency Manual (Marneffe & Manning, 2008 A simple sentence is build up of one independent clause whereas a complex or compound sentence is built from at least two clauses. From the sample sentences, we have got the Stanford Typed Dependency notations as shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Simple Sentence Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Stanford Parser produces 55 different typed dependencies [23]. These dependencies reflect the grammatical relationships between the words.…”
Section: Interaction By Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%