2001
DOI: 10.1353/lan.2001.0025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Stage/Individual Distinction and (In)alienable Possession

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a word, if (22) is correct, one can capture the parallelism between nonverbal predicative phrases and spatial PPs observed in (17), as follows: In (17), we saw that the PP niwa-de ''in the garden'' is a PredP adjoined to a dynamic event. As predicted, the contrast between (24a) and (24a') suggests that this phrase can indirectly modify a noun that has an event argument (or e-place); according to Ogawa (2001), event nominals, IAP (inalienable possession) nominals, and relational nominals are stage-level predicates with an e-place. I assume that the de-PredP in (24a') is predicated of this e-place.…”
Section: Spatial Pps and Non-verbal Predicative Phrasesmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In a word, if (22) is correct, one can capture the parallelism between nonverbal predicative phrases and spatial PPs observed in (17), as follows: In (17), we saw that the PP niwa-de ''in the garden'' is a PredP adjoined to a dynamic event. As predicted, the contrast between (24a) and (24a') suggests that this phrase can indirectly modify a noun that has an event argument (or e-place); according to Ogawa (2001), event nominals, IAP (inalienable possession) nominals, and relational nominals are stage-level predicates with an e-place. I assume that the de-PredP in (24a') is predicated of this e-place.…”
Section: Spatial Pps and Non-verbal Predicative Phrasesmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In (45), (46), and (47), a-words function as adjuncts. They can be state-denoting predicative complements also; in (49), they function as complements of intransitive verbs and the copular be, while in (50) they function as complements of transitive verbs or small-clause predicates.…”
Section: (I) A-words As Placep/predpmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…I assume that if the kernel element is relational (e.g. taidu ‘attitude’, linju ‘neighbor’, or body part terms such as shou ‘hand’), it is possible that the non‐kernel element is merged with the kernel element first, satisfying the selection of the latter (Castillo 2001, Ogawa 2001), and then is remerged as the Specifier of de .…”
Section: Argument a For The New Account Of The Cce: Similar Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not , it is possible that the non-kernel element is merged with the kernel element first, satisfying the selection of the latter (Castillo 2001, Ogawa 2001, and then is remerged as the Specifier of de.…”
Section: The Various Categories Of Kernel-final Constructionsmentioning
confidence: 99%