The Nutrition Handbook for Food Processors 2002
DOI: 10.1533/9781855736658.2.247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The stability of vitamins during food processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…losses in transport, storage and food preparation (Table 2) were used to modify the nutrient composition of all foods containing wheat flour (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19) .…”
Section: Nutrient Intake Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…losses in transport, storage and food preparation (Table 2) were used to modify the nutrient composition of all foods containing wheat flour (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19) .…”
Section: Nutrient Intake Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among women, 56 % and 70 % in Hebron and Gaza City, respectively, had very low serum vitamin D concentrations (<27·5 µmol/l; data not shown). (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19) . †The DFE shown are calculated as folic acid multiplied by 1·7 because of the higher bioavailability of this compound over natural sources of folate.…”
Section: Biochemical Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acid hydrolysis of the samples was necessary for the conversion of biological forms of riboflavin, FMN and FAD, to riboflavin, a form being utilized by L. rhamnosus (Eitenmiller and Landen, 2000). The final pH of the sample is extremely important because once a certain pH is reached, the riboflavin becomes biologically inactive and an accurate determination of riboflavin in the sample is no longer possible (Ottaway, 2002;Prodanov et al, 2004). The best pH for sample determination that does not reduce the biologically available riboflavin but allows for the optimum growth of L. rhamnosus is 6.8 (Sneath et al, 1986;GamarNourani et al, 1998;Ottaway, 2002).…”
Section: Riboflavin Quantification In Food and Cereal Grain Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final pH of the sample is extremely important because once a certain pH is reached, the riboflavin becomes biologically inactive and an accurate determination of riboflavin in the sample is no longer possible (Ottaway, 2002;Prodanov et al, 2004). The best pH for sample determination that does not reduce the biologically available riboflavin but allows for the optimum growth of L. rhamnosus is 6.8 (Sneath et al, 1986;GamarNourani et al, 1998;Ottaway, 2002). We did not find any reports regarding a potential adverse effect of the sulfuric acid compared to hydrochloric acid (Angyal, 1996) on L. rhamnosus growth performance when this chemical was used for the achievement of optimal pH.…”
Section: Riboflavin Quantification In Food and Cereal Grain Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation