Abstract:In contrast to long-term relationships, far less is known about the temporal evolution of transient relationships, although these constitute a substantial fraction of people’s communication networks. Previous literature suggests that ratings of relationship emotional intensity decay gradually until the relationship ends. Using mobile phone data from three countries (US, UK, and Italy), we demonstrate that the volume of communication between ego and its transient alters does not display such a systematic decay,… Show more
“…Although much of the literature in this field focuses on long-lasting and subjectively important relationships (such as family or very long-term friends) [6][7][8], in reality a considerable portion of people's communication is dedicated to relatively short-term contacts (lasting in the order of a few months, perhaps a year). To begin to unravel this overlooked portion of people's communication, recent research has defined and described transient social relationships [9]: they are short-lived ties with an identifiable beginning and where communication gets suspended for a considerable period of time that suggests the end of the most active part of relationship. Even though they have an ephemeral nature, they account for a significant proportion of communication activity: even if these relationships remain active for five or six months, they receive roughly between 1 and 3 phone calls every 15 days, which signals their importance [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To begin to unravel this overlooked portion of people’s communication, recent research has defined and described transient social relationships [ 9 ]: they are short-lived ties with an identifiable beginning and where communication gets suspended for a considerable period of time that suggests the end of the most active part of relationship. Even though they have an ephemeral nature, they account for a significant proportion of communication activity: even if these relationships remain active for five or six months, they receive roughly between 1 and 3 phone calls every 15 days, which signals their importance [ 9 ]. Among the outstanding questions to be tackled, it is still unclear what contributes to transient relationships emergence and what factors affect their duration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the outstanding questions to be tackled, it is still unclear what contributes to transient relationships emergence and what factors affect their duration. Crucially, in light of the large percentages of communication that transient relationships receive (ranging between 17% and 45% depending on the cohort [ 9 ]), the dynamics of ego networks cannot be understood without taking them into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the few things known, previous research identifies a positive relationship between the amount of time a transient tie remains active (lifetime) and call volume [ 9 , 10 ]. However, it is also known that time is an inelastic resource [ 11 ], and therefore people need to make multiple decisions that enable meaningful social relationships to be maintained, so their ‘need to belong’ (to have satisfying and meaningful connections with others) is met [ 12 ], and less attention is given to those relationships perceived as less important.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data accessibility. Data files and code to produce the analysis reported in this manuscript can be found in Hidd [9], The Rhythms of Transient Relationships: Allocating Time between Weekdays and Weekends, Dryad Digital Repository: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.w6m905qv9 [37].…”
A fundamental question of any new relationship is, will it last? Transient relationships, recently defined by the authors, are an ideal type of social tie to explore this question: these relationships are characterized by distinguishable starting and ending temporal points, linking the question of tie longevity to relationship finite lifetime. In this study, we use mobile phone data sets from the UK and Italy to analyse the weekly allocation of time invested in maintaining transient relationships. We find that more relationships are created during weekdays, with a greater proportion of them receiving more contact during these days of the week in the long term. The smaller group of relationships that receive more phone calls during the weekend tend to remain active for more time. We uncover a sorting process by which some ties are moved from weekdays to weekends and
vice versa
, mostly in the first half of the relationship. This process also carries more information about the ultimate lifetime of a tie than the part of the week when the relationship started, which suggests an early evaluation period that leads to a decision on how to allocate time to different types of transient ties.
“…Although much of the literature in this field focuses on long-lasting and subjectively important relationships (such as family or very long-term friends) [6][7][8], in reality a considerable portion of people's communication is dedicated to relatively short-term contacts (lasting in the order of a few months, perhaps a year). To begin to unravel this overlooked portion of people's communication, recent research has defined and described transient social relationships [9]: they are short-lived ties with an identifiable beginning and where communication gets suspended for a considerable period of time that suggests the end of the most active part of relationship. Even though they have an ephemeral nature, they account for a significant proportion of communication activity: even if these relationships remain active for five or six months, they receive roughly between 1 and 3 phone calls every 15 days, which signals their importance [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To begin to unravel this overlooked portion of people’s communication, recent research has defined and described transient social relationships [ 9 ]: they are short-lived ties with an identifiable beginning and where communication gets suspended for a considerable period of time that suggests the end of the most active part of relationship. Even though they have an ephemeral nature, they account for a significant proportion of communication activity: even if these relationships remain active for five or six months, they receive roughly between 1 and 3 phone calls every 15 days, which signals their importance [ 9 ]. Among the outstanding questions to be tackled, it is still unclear what contributes to transient relationships emergence and what factors affect their duration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the outstanding questions to be tackled, it is still unclear what contributes to transient relationships emergence and what factors affect their duration. Crucially, in light of the large percentages of communication that transient relationships receive (ranging between 17% and 45% depending on the cohort [ 9 ]), the dynamics of ego networks cannot be understood without taking them into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the few things known, previous research identifies a positive relationship between the amount of time a transient tie remains active (lifetime) and call volume [ 9 , 10 ]. However, it is also known that time is an inelastic resource [ 11 ], and therefore people need to make multiple decisions that enable meaningful social relationships to be maintained, so their ‘need to belong’ (to have satisfying and meaningful connections with others) is met [ 12 ], and less attention is given to those relationships perceived as less important.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data accessibility. Data files and code to produce the analysis reported in this manuscript can be found in Hidd [9], The Rhythms of Transient Relationships: Allocating Time between Weekdays and Weekends, Dryad Digital Repository: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.w6m905qv9 [37].…”
A fundamental question of any new relationship is, will it last? Transient relationships, recently defined by the authors, are an ideal type of social tie to explore this question: these relationships are characterized by distinguishable starting and ending temporal points, linking the question of tie longevity to relationship finite lifetime. In this study, we use mobile phone data sets from the UK and Italy to analyse the weekly allocation of time invested in maintaining transient relationships. We find that more relationships are created during weekdays, with a greater proportion of them receiving more contact during these days of the week in the long term. The smaller group of relationships that receive more phone calls during the weekend tend to remain active for more time. We uncover a sorting process by which some ties are moved from weekdays to weekends and
vice versa
, mostly in the first half of the relationship. This process also carries more information about the ultimate lifetime of a tie than the part of the week when the relationship started, which suggests an early evaluation period that leads to a decision on how to allocate time to different types of transient ties.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.