1966
DOI: 10.1016/0022-1902(66)80238-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The stabilities and thermodynamic functions for the formation of aluminium and mercury (II) chelates of certain polyaminepolyacetic acids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…40 Doi tried to verify the correctness of his value by a comparison of his ΔS°for Fe III edta with that of Al III edta. 48,49 This comparison cannot be considered reasonable because there is a large difference between the ionic radii of Al III (0.535 A ˚) and Fe III (0.645 A ˚), 50 leading to the expected higher ΔS°values for the formation of aluminum(III) complexes as compared to those of iron(III) complexes. We consider our data for Fe III edta to be more reliable based on the following arguments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…40 Doi tried to verify the correctness of his value by a comparison of his ΔS°for Fe III edta with that of Al III edta. 48,49 This comparison cannot be considered reasonable because there is a large difference between the ionic radii of Al III (0.535 A ˚) and Fe III (0.645 A ˚), 50 leading to the expected higher ΔS°values for the formation of aluminum(III) complexes as compared to those of iron(III) complexes. We consider our data for Fe III edta to be more reliable based on the following arguments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large discrepancy is apparent upon comparison of our Δ H ° value for the complex formation of Fe III edta with the value reported by Doi . Doi tried to verify the correctness of his value by a comparison of his Δ S ° for Fe III edta with that of Al III edta. , This comparison cannot be considered reasonable because there is a large difference between the ionic radii of Al III (0.535 Å) and Fe III (0.645 Å), leading to the expected higher Δ S ° values for the formation of aluminum(III) complexes as compared to those of iron(III) complexes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whenever possible the Aml's as expressed in eq 6 were calculated directly from the potentiometric titration data of the 1:1 metal-ligand systems. The titration curves are shown in HEDTA 17.2b (4) UEDDA 16.75 (5) DGENTA 13.26 (4) 9.70 (4) IDA 12.76 (4) HIDA 11.33 (3) DTMA 4.51 (2) CA 10.02 (2)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%