2017
DOI: 10.1002/app5.181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Sri Lankan Civil War and Australia's Migration Policy Response: A Historical Case Study with Contemporary Implications

Abstract: Sri Lanka's civil war lasted almost 26 years and cost tens of thousands of lives. Since

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All participants migrated to Australia in the 1980s and 1990s with the stated intention of escaping the armed violence and economic instability of the civil war in Sri Lanka that lasted from 1983 to 2009 (see Betts & Higgins, 2017; De Mel et al., 2012). Despite the war, participants had access to public primary, secondary, and tertiary education in their home country and, in Australia, to courses in universities, enabling employment in professions that were also included in Australia's points‐based migration system as jobs in high demand.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All participants migrated to Australia in the 1980s and 1990s with the stated intention of escaping the armed violence and economic instability of the civil war in Sri Lanka that lasted from 1983 to 2009 (see Betts & Higgins, 2017; De Mel et al., 2012). Despite the war, participants had access to public primary, secondary, and tertiary education in their home country and, in Australia, to courses in universities, enabling employment in professions that were also included in Australia's points‐based migration system as jobs in high demand.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The White Australia policy that prevented people of colour from migrating to Australia was abolished in 1973 (Jupp, 2007: 6–10), and a decade later, the civil war in Sri Lanka that began in 1983 saw Sri Lankans increasingly choosing Australia as a safe haven for migration. However, as the majority ethnicity in Sri Lanka, the Sinhalese were not entitled for humanitarian visas, unlike the persecuted Tamil minority (Betts and Higgins, 2017). Sinhalese, hence, sought to migrate as professionals through Australia’s points-based skilled migration system.…”
Section: Situating Sri Lankans In a Multicultural Australiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implementing this 'turn back the boats' policy meant that Sri Lankan Tamil asylum-seekers were transferred to offshore detention centres on Manus Island in Papua New Guinea, or on Nauru Island (J. Betts & Higgins, 2016). Since then, constant maritime interception has been carried out by Australian Border Force officials in order to combat boat smuggling of Sri Lankans to Australia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%