1980
DOI: 10.1017/s0022112080001516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The spreading of thin liquid films on a water-air interface

Abstract: The spreading on a water–air interface of a thin liquid film is examined for the situation in which surface tension gradients drive the motion. A similarity solution is obtained numerically for unidirectional spreading when some general restrictions concerning the form of the liquid film constitutive relation is made. This solution gives the size of the film as a function of time and also the velocity and thickness distribution along the spreading film. Experiments are performed which show good agreement with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

7
81
0
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
7
81
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This scaling suggests a widening dynamics in agreement with the dynamics of Marangoni spreading, i.e. the spontaneous spreading of a thin film (of say oil phase) along the surface of a deep fluid layer (of say aqueous phase) of higher surface tension [24][25][26]. The driving stress of the spreading is the surface tension gradient associated with the presence of an oil drop at the interface between air and the liquid film.…”
supporting
confidence: 56%
“…This scaling suggests a widening dynamics in agreement with the dynamics of Marangoni spreading, i.e. the spontaneous spreading of a thin film (of say oil phase) along the surface of a deep fluid layer (of say aqueous phase) of higher surface tension [24][25][26]. The driving stress of the spreading is the surface tension gradient associated with the presence of an oil drop at the interface between air and the liquid film.…”
supporting
confidence: 56%
“…Laminar boundary layer calculations have shown that during the late stages of an oil spill, the spreading rate is directly controlled by the balance between surface tension gradients generated at the air-liquid interface and the viscous drag generated in the water sublayer by the advancing oil film. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] Some of the more recent studies have generalized the spreading process to include different spreading geometries and film ''feeding rates'' as well as additional forces like gravity, capillarity, and surface diffusion. These modeling efforts have not yet been extended to include evaporation or dissolution, additional mechanisms which can significantly affect the spreading rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While early experiments in rectilinear geometry [6][7][8][9][10] suggested that the prefactor k is dependent on film constitutive behavior, later experiments by Camp and Berg 11,12 demonstrated that this constant depends only on spreading geometry. Recent calculations 13 suggest universal values of kϭ1.4150 for rectilinear spreading ͑in good agreement with Camp and Berg's 11,12 experimental value of 1.4Ϯ0.04) and kϭ1.0754 for axisymmetric spreading.…”
Section: ͑1͒mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This specific feature of the surface velocity profile, which depends on film constitutive behavior, has not been predicted by the theoretical models developed to describe the spreading of surface active films on a deep liquid layer. 9,10,[16][17][18] Phillips has recently indicated that there do exist eigenfunctions in the spreading problem which might display this interesting jump property. 13 The theoretical models that have been proposed predict certain distinctive features in the sublayer flow.…”
Section: ͑1͒mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation