2009
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0903446106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The spread of modern humans in Europe

Abstract: The earliest credible evidence of Homo sapiens in Europe is an archaeological proxy in the form of several artifact assemblages (Bohunician) found in South-Central and possibly Eastern Europe, dating to <48,000 calibrated radiocarbon years before present (cal BP). They are similar to assemblages probably made by modern humans in the Levant (Emiran) at an earlier date and apparently represent a population movement into the Balkans during a warm climate interval [Greenland Interstadial 12 (GI 12)]. A second popu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
55
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This would include the identification of hominins, which contain unique mass values for three peptide markers (1219.6 þ 1235.6, 1477.8 and 2832.4 for peptide markers A, B and E, respectively; Buckley and Kansa, 2011). The proteomic identification of such fragmentary bone specimens as hominins in key archaeological contexts would facilitate subsequent proteomic and genomic analysis, thereby providing a much needed detailed temporal and geographic understanding of the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic transition, an issue raised previously as well (Churchill and Smith, 2000;Hoffecker, 2009;Hublin, in press). A similar argument pertains to identifying faunal taxa whose fragmentation (history) effectively removes morphological diagnostic criteria for identification.…”
Section: Taxa Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This would include the identification of hominins, which contain unique mass values for three peptide markers (1219.6 þ 1235.6, 1477.8 and 2832.4 for peptide markers A, B and E, respectively; Buckley and Kansa, 2011). The proteomic identification of such fragmentary bone specimens as hominins in key archaeological contexts would facilitate subsequent proteomic and genomic analysis, thereby providing a much needed detailed temporal and geographic understanding of the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic transition, an issue raised previously as well (Churchill and Smith, 2000;Hoffecker, 2009;Hublin, in press). A similar argument pertains to identifying faunal taxa whose fragmentation (history) effectively removes morphological diagnostic criteria for identification.…”
Section: Taxa Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, identification of hominin bones for the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic transition are important because only a small number of specimens are currently available for late Neanderthals, and almost none for early modern humans in Western Europe (Churchill and Smith, 2000;Hoffecker, 2009;Hublin, in press.). Molecular identification methods have the potential to identify additional hominin remains among fragmentary bone assemblages, allowing additional genomic and proteomic study of these complex technocomplexes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They existed in diverse forms. Except in hindsight it is difficult to see these forms as stepping stones to Homo sapiens, each one better adopted than its historical predecessor (Hoffecker, 2009;Hublin, 2009;Reich et al, 2010).…”
Section: ~ 16 ~mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is even hypothesised that some stages in human development can be attributed, at least in part, to individual AETs triggered, for example, by climatic influences (e.g. Tzedakis et al, 2007;Hoffecker, 2009), volcanic catastrophe (Golovanova et al, 2010;Fitzsimmons et al, 2013) or a combination of both (e.g. Fedele et al, 2002Fedele et al, , 2008Costa et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Important and controversial threads within this developing discourse include the origins and spread of modern humans (e.g. Smith et al, 2005;Trinkaus, 2005;Carto et al, 2009;Hoffecker, 2009); the causes of human demographic fluctuations (e.g. Blockley et al, 2006;Blome et al, 2012;Eriksson et al, 2012) and of sudden cultural innovations (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%