2011
DOI: 10.1484/m.usml-eb.3.4949
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Spread of English in the Records of Central Government, 1400-1430

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, when royal clerks were engaged in professional activities, they may have been so in the general London-Westminster area as opposed to specifically at Westminster. Dodd's (2011bDodd's ( : 244, cf. 2011a distinction between "the clerks and scribes who inhabited the writing offices of Westminster" and "their freelance colleagues based in London" echoes older scholarship, whereas the newer view is that "[r]oyal clerks were ubiquitous in London" (Richardson 2011: 49).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, when royal clerks were engaged in professional activities, they may have been so in the general London-Westminster area as opposed to specifically at Westminster. Dodd's (2011bDodd's ( : 244, cf. 2011a distinction between "the clerks and scribes who inhabited the writing offices of Westminster" and "their freelance colleagues based in London" echoes older scholarship, whereas the newer view is that "[r]oyal clerks were ubiquitous in London" (Richardson 2011: 49).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One part of the evidence is that Chancery documents do not, in fact, show any unidirectional development toward the variety that has developed into present-day Standard English over time, let alone any sudden, categorical shift indicative of imposition of standardised spelling forms by a regulating body (Benskin 2004). This is to the extent that the clerks wrote in English in the first place, since Latin continued to dominate (Benskin 2004;Dodd 2011aDodd , 2011b, and it is to the extent that the language of a Chancery document is representative, for Chancery not only issued documents and dispatched them to recipients. The institution also received documents produced elsewhere for archiving purposes, which often entailed Chancery clerks copying them (cf.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%