1971
DOI: 10.1071/ea9710113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The spread of cross-pollination in a solid block of Granny Smith apples

Abstract: Numbers of fruits per tree were determined in a solid block of Granny Smith apple trees into which shoots of the pollen donor Abas had been placed at flowering time. Fruit numbers declined rapidly from 46 per tree nearest the donor to a background level of 0-2 fruits 12 m distant. This distance was taken as the limit of cross-pollination. Apart from a significant spread of setting with the prevailing wind, fruit numbers were related to distance from the pollen donor. This relationship was described by an equat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar patterns of pollen dispersal have been estimated for apple orchards previously, based on patterns of fruit set in monotypic blocks and, more recently, using morphological markers (Free, 1962;Free and Spencer-Booth, 1964;Maggs et al, 1971;Milutinovic et al, 1995;Wertheim, 1991). For example, Milutinovic et al (1995) examined fruit set in monotypic blocks of three apple cultivars, which were grown on wild rootstock and received no supplemental pollination.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Similar patterns of pollen dispersal have been estimated for apple orchards previously, based on patterns of fruit set in monotypic blocks and, more recently, using morphological markers (Free, 1962;Free and Spencer-Booth, 1964;Maggs et al, 1971;Milutinovic et al, 1995;Wertheim, 1991). For example, Milutinovic et al (1995) examined fruit set in monotypic blocks of three apple cultivars, which were grown on wild rootstock and received no supplemental pollination.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%