2002
DOI: 10.1053/jars.2002.29877
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The split-line pattern of the distal femur

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a vertical plane, fluid pressure was essentially ). Four different fiber orientations were considered as shown with A, B, C and D zones (adapted from the split-lines in [7]). The size of the tissue considered is 14 9 10 9 2 mm with 2 mm in the depth or z direction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a vertical plane, fluid pressure was essentially ). Four different fiber orientations were considered as shown with A, B, C and D zones (adapted from the split-lines in [7]). The size of the tissue considered is 14 9 10 9 2 mm with 2 mm in the depth or z direction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). The split-line pattern [7] was used to determine the primary fiber orientations. Cartilage thickness was taken to be 2 mm, in agreement with published values [1,40].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local split-line direction was visualized by inserting a surgical needle dipped in India ink (Below et al, 2002) into the cartilage surface immediately adjacent to each 6 mm diameter explant (Figure 1A). Each explant was cut in half either parallel to or perpendicular to the local split-line direction, removed from the condyle, and wrapped in gauze soaked in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) for intermediate storage at −20°C.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on distance from the articular surface, the ECM is divided into three zones (superficial, middle, and deep) that vary in molecular composition (Muir et al, 1970; Venn and Maroudas, 1977) and matrix architecture (Hwang et al, 1992; Jeffery et al, 1991; Vanden Berg-Foels et al, 2012; Yin et al, 2011). Split-lines are indicative of the preferred collagen fiber orientation parallel to the articular surface (Below et al, 2002; Meachim et al, 1974) and provide an additional component of structural anisotropy. Variations in composition and ultrastructure contribute to the depth- (Chen et al, 2001; Jurvelin et al, 1997; Kempson et al, 1973; Schinagl et al, 1997; Wang et al, 2002a; Wang et al, 2002b; Wu and Herzog, 2002) and directional-dependent (Chahine et al, 2004; Huang et al, 2005; Jurvelin et al, 2003; Mizrahi et al, 1986; Wang et al, 2003) macroscale mechanical properties of the cartilage ECM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the superficial zone, the fibers were oriented according to the split lines recorded from the surface ([32]; adopted from Figure 2 in [30]). In the middle zone, the fibers did not have any specific orientation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%