[1993] Proceedings IEEE Workshop on FPGAs for Custom Computing Machines
DOI: 10.1109/fpga.1993.279475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Splash 2 software environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Integrating Reconfigurable computing with traditional Computing systems has been a challenge since the early days of FPGAs; several machines have been designed to this direction, such as PAM [1], Splash [2], and DISC [3]. The primary drawback of all these attempts was the limited bandwidth and increased communication latency between the host general purpose processor and the reconfigurable device.…”
Section: List Of Tablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Integrating Reconfigurable computing with traditional Computing systems has been a challenge since the early days of FPGAs; several machines have been designed to this direction, such as PAM [1], Splash [2], and DISC [3]. The primary drawback of all these attempts was the limited bandwidth and increased communication latency between the host general purpose processor and the reconfigurable device.…”
Section: List Of Tablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The host can write and read data from the FPGA(1), the FPGA can send data to the host in the form of an interrupt (2), and the FPGA can read and write data to/from the main memory(3). More precisely, the following communication types are supported:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In past efforts, tools were provided which provided a limited form of logical to physical mapping based on signal names. An example of this is the t2 tool provided with the Splash-2 CCM [1]. This proved to be quite limiting, as signal names are merged and changed during the backend tool flow (during mapping, placement, and routing).…”
Section: Symbol Mapping Facilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the Splash 2 run-time environment [5] provided both an API as well as a run-time debugging tool named t2 which could be used to execute and debug a design. The tool provided a facility to watch the values of signals as designs' clocks were stepped-a functionality utilizing the Xilinx XC4000's readback capability.…”
Section: Supplementary Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%