The spindle checkpoint: two transitions, two pathways

Gardner, Richard D.; Burke, Daniel J.

doi:10.1016/s0962-8924(00)01727-x

Cited by 143 publications

(90 citation statements)

References 46 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Mitotic checkpoints are known to delay progression through mitosis in yeast and vertebrate mutants with defective spindles (Gardner and Burke, 2000; …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Once captured, sister chromatids are segregated, one to each of two daughter cells. Eukaryotic cells have evolved a mechanism called the spindle checkpoint, to monitor chromosomal segregation and increase the fidelity of mitosis (reviewed in Gardner and Burke, 2000;McIntosh et al, 2002). Until spindle microtubules from both poles capture and align all sister chromatid pairs at a metaphase plate, the spindle checkpoint produces a delay in the onset of anaphase.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Spindle Checkpoint Functions during Mitosis in the EarlyCaenorhabditis elegansEmbryo

Encalada

Willis

Lyczak

et al. 2005

MBoC

118

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

During mitosis, chromosome segregation is regulated by a spindle checkpoint mechanism. This checkpoint delays anaphase until all kinetochores are captured by microtubules from both spindle poles, chromosomes congress to the metaphase plate, and the tension between kinetochores and their attached microtubules is properly sensed. Although the spindle checkpoint can be activated in many different cell types, the role of this regulatory mechanism in rapidly dividing embryonic animal cells has remained controversial. Here, using time-lapse imaging of live embryonic cells, we show that chemical or mutational disruption of the mitotic spindle in early Caenorhabditis elegans embryos delays progression through mitosis. By reducing the function of conserved checkpoint genes in mutant embryos with defective mitotic spindles, we show that these delays require the spindle checkpoint. In the absence of a functional checkpoint, more severe defects in chromosome segregation are observed in mutants with abnormal mitotic spindles. We also show that the conserved kinesin CeMCAK, the CENP-F-related proteins HCP-1 and HCP-2, and the core kinetochore protein CeCENP-C all are required for this checkpoint. Our analysis indicates that spindle checkpoint mechanisms are functional in the rapidly dividing cells of an early animal embryo and that this checkpoint can prevent chromosome segregation defects during mitosis. INTRODUCTIONDuring mitosis, some microtubules emanating from bipolar microtubule organizing centers grow toward chromosomes and attach to specialized chromosomal regions called kinetochores (Skibbens and Hieter, 1998;Cleveland et al., 2003). Once captured, sister chromatids are segregated, one to each of two daughter cells. Eukaryotic cells have evolved a mechanism called the spindle checkpoint, to monitor chromosomal segregation and increase the fidelity of mitosis (reviewed in Gardner and Burke, 2000;McIntosh et al., 2002). Until spindle microtubules from both poles capture and align all sister chromatid pairs at a metaphase plate, the spindle checkpoint produces a delay in the onset of anaphase. If this delay is bypassed by reducing checkpoint function, anaphase starts prematurely, and daughter cells may receive unequal complements of chromosomes. Such genomic instability can result in lethality and in tumorigenesis (Hartwell and Kastan, 1994;Basu et al., 1999).Originally identified and characterized in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, seven spindle assembly checkpoint genes (MAD1, MAD2, MAD3, BUB1, BUB2, BUB3, and MPS1) are known to function at kinetochores to inhibit anaphase onset, or to mediate mitotic exit in the presence of spindle abnormalities (Hoyt et al., 1991;Li and Murray, 1991). Mutations in these genes reduce or eliminate the cell cycle delays that normally occur after treatment with microtubule depolymerizing drugs (Wang and Burke, 1995;Pangilinan and Spencer, 1996). Bub1 and Bub3 form a protein kinase complex that, in concert with Mps1, functions at kinetochores upstream of Mad1 and Mad2 (Roberts et al., 1994;H...

show abstract

“…Mitotic checkpoints are known to delay progression through mitosis in yeast and vertebrate mutants with defective spindles (Gardner and Burke, 2000; …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Spindle Checkpoint Functions during Mitosis in the EarlyCaenorhabditis elegansEmbryo

Encalada

Willis

Lyczak

et al. 2005

MBoC

118

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…27 Several studies indicate that mutations in genes controlling chromosome segregation during mitosis and centrosome abnormalities play a critical role in causing chromosome instability in cancer. [28][29][30][31] Chromosomal aberrations consistent with impaired fidelity of chromosome segregation during mitosis have been shown to occur exclusively in aneuploid tumor cell lines. 27 These observations point to a key role of aberrant DNA content in carcinogenesis.…”

Section: Genomic Instability In Oral Carcinogenesismentioning

confidence: 99%

Novel Management of Oral Cancer: A Paradigm of Predictive Oncology

Sudbø¹

2004

Clinical Medicine & Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The rationale for molecular-targeted prevention of oral cancer is strong. Oral cancer is a major global threat to public health with 300,000 new cases diagnosed worldwide on an annual basis. Notably, the great morbidity and mortality rates of this devastating disease have not improved in decades. Oral cancer development is a tobacco-related multistep and multifocal process involving field carcinogenesis and intraepithelial clonal spread. Biomarkers of genomic instability, such as aneuploidy and allelic imbalance, can accurately measure the cancer risk of oral premalignant lesions or intraepithelial neoplasia (IEN). Retinoid-oral IEN studies (e.g., retinoid acid receptor-β, p53, genetic instability, loss of heterozygosity, and cyclin D1) have advanced the overall understanding of the biology of intraepithelial carcinogenesis and preventive agent molecular mechanisms and targets, important advances for monitoring preventive interventions, assessing cancer risk, and pharmacogenomics. Clinical management of oral IEN varies from watchful waiting to complete resection, although complete resection does not prevent oral cancer in high-risk patients. New approaches, such as interventions with molecular-targeted agents and agent combinations in molecularly defined high-risk oral IEN patients, are urgently needed to reduce the devastating worldwide consequences of oral cancer.

show abstract

“…Seven mitotic checkpoint genes, BUB1, BUB2, BUB3, MAD1, MAD2, MAD3, and MPS1, were originally identified via genetic screens in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Hoyt et al, 1991;Li and Murray, 1991;Weiss and Winey, 1996). These genes act along two separate mitotic checkpoint pathways (Clarke and Gimenez-Abian, 2000;Daum et al, 2000;Gardner and Burke, 2000). MPS1, BUB1, BUB3, MAD1, MAD2, and MAD3 monitor kinetochore microtubule attachments and prevent premature chromosome segregation by inhibiting degradation of securin/Pds1 and mitotic cyclins (Wassmann and Benezra, 2001;Peters, 2002).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Human MPS1 Kinase Is Required for Mitotic Arrest Induced by the Loss of CENP-E from Kinetochores

Liu

Chan

Hittle

et al. 2003

MBoC

148

177

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We have determined that the previously identified dual-specificity protein kinase TTK is the human orthologue of the yeast MPS1 kinase. Yeast MPS1 (monopolar spindle) is required for spindle pole duplication and the spindle checkpoint. Consistent with the recently identified vertebrate MPS1 homologues, we found that hMPS1 is localized to centrosomes and kinetochores. In addition, hMPS1 is part of a growing list of kinetochore proteins that are localized to nuclear pores. hMPS1 is required by cells to arrest in mitosis in response to spindle defects and kinetochore defects resulting from the loss of the kinesin-like protein, CENP-E. The pattern of kinetochore localization of hMPS1 in CENP-E defective cells suggests that their interaction with the kinetochore is sensitive to microtubule occupancy rather than kinetochore tension. hMPS1 is required for MAD1, MAD2 but not hBUB1, hBUBR1 and hROD to bind to kinetochores. We localized the kinetochore targeting domain in hMPS1 and found that it can abrogate the mitotic checkpoint in a dominant negative manner. Last, hMPS1 was found to associate with the anaphase promoting complex, thus raising the possibility that its checkpoint functions extend beyond the kinetochore. INTRODUCTIONThe mitotic checkpoint is a fail-safe mechanism that ensures accurate chromosome segregation by preventing cells from prematurely exiting mitosis in the presence of unaligned chromosomes (Nicklas, 1997;Rieder and Salmon, 1998;Amon, 1999). This checkpoint system is highly sensitive, because even a single unaligned chromosome is sufficient to block cells from entering anaphase (Rieder et al., 1994;Li and Nicklas, 1997). The mitotic checkpoint has been shown to monitor both microtubule attachment and tension generated across sister kinetochores by poleward forces (Rieder et al., 1994;Li and Nicklas, 1997;Waters et al., 1998). Failure of the mitotic checkpoint causes cells to exit mitosis in the presence of unaligned chromosomes and is a major mechanism responsible for aneuploidy (Jallepalli and Lengauer, 2001). Seven mitotic checkpoint genes, BUB1, BUB2, BUB3, MAD1, MAD2, MAD3, and MPS1, were originally identified via genetic screens in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Hoyt et al., 1991;Li and Murray, 1991;Weiss and Winey, 1996). These genes act along two separate mitotic checkpoint pathways (Clarke and Gimenez-Abian, 2000;Daum et al., 2000;Gardner and Burke, 2000). MPS1, BUB1, BUB3, MAD1, MAD2, and MAD3 monitor kinetochore microtubule attachments and prevent premature chromosome segregation by inhibiting degradation of securin/Pds1 and mitotic cyclins (Wassmann and Benezra, 2001;Peters, 2002). BUB2 acts along a different pathway that monitors spindle integrity and orientation and prevents premature cytokinesis by inhibiting the degradation of the mitotic cyclin Clb2 (Alexandru et al., 1999;Fesquet et al., 1999;Fraschini et al., 1999;Li, 1999;Bardin et al., 2000;Bloecher et al., 2000;Pereira et al., 2000).Many of the mitotic checkpoint genes in yeast are evolutionarily conserved, because orthologues of M...

show abstract

The spindle checkpoint: two transitions, two pathways

Cited by 143 publications

References 46 publications

A Spindle Checkpoint Functions during Mitosis in the EarlyCaenorhabditis elegansEmbryo

A Spindle Checkpoint Functions during Mitosis in the EarlyCaenorhabditis elegansEmbryo

Novel Management of Oral Cancer: A Paradigm of Predictive Oncology

Human MPS1 Kinase Is Required for Mitotic Arrest Induced by the Loss of CENP-E from Kinetochores

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About