Designing 2D and 3D Network-on-Chip Architectures 2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-4274-5_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Spidergon STNoC

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common NoC topologies are mesh, torus, tree, polygon, and butterfly [190]. In this context, researchers have worked in developing new topologies or modifying existing ones to implement communication infrastructure improvements like circulant topology [203] and Butterfly-Fat-Tree topology [183] for improving fault-tolerance, honeycomb topology [160] for improving network-cost, WK-Recursive topology [192] for improving power efficiency and latency, RicoBit topology [190] for improving latency, or Spidergon topology [205] for improving structure and modularity. Also, new development includes not only 2D topologies but also 3D topologies [142,143,161,173,174,189,190].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common NoC topologies are mesh, torus, tree, polygon, and butterfly [190]. In this context, researchers have worked in developing new topologies or modifying existing ones to implement communication infrastructure improvements like circulant topology [203] and Butterfly-Fat-Tree topology [183] for improving fault-tolerance, honeycomb topology [160] for improving network-cost, WK-Recursive topology [192] for improving power efficiency and latency, RicoBit topology [190] for improving latency, or Spidergon topology [205] for improving structure and modularity. Also, new development includes not only 2D topologies but also 3D topologies [142,143,161,173,174,189,190].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%