2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0925-4005(03)00228-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The speed of response of MISiCFET devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second uses flow rates more traditional in laboratories, of the order of 100 cm 3 /min. Two injectors, which permanently inject both concentrations, are alternatively moved below the sensor within milliseconds [3,4].…”
Section: "Intrinsic" Response and Recovery Timesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second uses flow rates more traditional in laboratories, of the order of 100 cm 3 /min. Two injectors, which permanently inject both concentrations, are alternatively moved below the sensor within milliseconds [3,4].…”
Section: "Intrinsic" Response and Recovery Timesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The response and recovery times reported in the literature or in technical notices of commercial sensors, automatically include the delays due to the fluid delivery system, specific to every experimental setup. Even if these delays can be reduced to a few milliseconds in some very special cases [1][2][3][4], they can never be totally suppressed. It is thus of primary importance to estimate, at least roughly, which part of the response/recovery time measured experimentally, arises from the fluid delivery system, before drawing conclusions about what is called hereafter the sensor "intrinsic" response/recovery time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Field effect sensors with Pt as catalytic gate material have been shown useful for combustion control applications in wood fired boilers [1], and for NH 3 detection in selective catalytic reduction (SCR) systems as well as for lambda cold start sensors [2]. In field effect devices, the sensor response depends on the interaction between the catalytic gate material and the gas molecules.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…monitoring of the emissions from cars a sensor response in the order of milliseconds [1] is necessary; in addition, the sensor has to withstand harsh environments with high temperatures and corrosive atmospheres.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another possible automotive application of a MISiC FET is as a lambda-sensitive device for enhancing the efficiency of the catalytic converter [10]. For these applications, it was reported that the sensor response time of a MISiC FET is below 100 ms for ammonia exposure (at 300°C) and below 20 ms for hydrogen (at 550°C) which exceeds requirements considerably [1]. The MISiC FET is also commercialized as a sensor system for control of domestic boilers [11], [12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%