2014
DOI: 10.1089/neu.2013.3255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Spectrum of Neurobehavioral Sequelae after Repetitive Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Novel Mouse Model of Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy

Abstract: There has been an increased focus on the neurological sequelae of repetitive mild traumatic brain injury (TBI), particularly neurodegenerative syndromes, such as chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE); however, no animal model exists that captures the behavioral spectrum of this phenomenon. We sought to develop an animal model of CTE. Our novel model is a modification and fusion of two of the most popular models of TBI and allows for controlled closed-head impacts to unanesthetized mice. Two-hundred and eighty… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

23
194
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 197 publications
(220 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
23
194
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several rodent models of rmCHI have been reported from two, three, five TBIs to 16 or 42 impacts at different intervals or frequencies. 23,24,[30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] In the present study, we chose a mouse model of rmCHI with three impacts at an interval of 24 hours, as reported previously. 5,23,24 As shown in our results, our model displayed mild brain trauma with low NSS scores and the absence of intracranial hemorrhage and convulsions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several rodent models of rmCHI have been reported from two, three, five TBIs to 16 or 42 impacts at different intervals or frequencies. 23,24,[30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] In the present study, we chose a mouse model of rmCHI with three impacts at an interval of 24 hours, as reported previously. 5,23,24 As shown in our results, our model displayed mild brain trauma with low NSS scores and the absence of intracranial hemorrhage and convulsions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there was no difference in the percentage of time spent in the open arms between the s‐mTBI and either of the control groups (s‐sham, 9.9 ±2.7%; r‐sham, 6.1 ± 2.1; s‐mTBI, 14.1 ± 4.3%; P  > 0.05 one‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test), the r‐mTBI group spent on average 30.1±8.3% of their time within the open arm (s‐sham or s‐mTBI, vs. r‐mTBI P  < 0.05; r‐sham vs. r‐mTBI, P  < 0.001; one way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test). Such an increased amount of time spent in the open arms is suggestive of disinhibition or increased risk‐taking behavior which has been previously observed in other mouse models of repetitive closed head injury 14, 24…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The issue of anesthesia and its interaction with mTBI-induced LOC will require future studies, but the introduction of rodent rmTBI models with no anesthesia will help to address these long-standing issues. 27 It is clear that exposure to previous mTBI does not increase LOC time in later mTBI exposures, and because our model is sensitive to increased impact strength, we conclude that the increased risk of developing incident concussions after prior mTBI 25 does not appear to be because of a lowering of threshold by prior mTBI.…”
Section: The Duration Of Loc Remains Constant After Rmtbimentioning
confidence: 57%