2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-007-9543-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The spectrum of ATM missense variants and their contribution to contralateral breast cancer

Abstract: Heterozygous carriers of ATM mutations are at increased risk of breast cancer. In this case-control study, we evaluated the significance of germline ATM missense variants to the risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC). We have determined the spectrum and frequency of ATM missense variants in 443 breast cancer patients diagnosed before age 50, including 247 patients who subsequently developed CBC. Twenty-one per cent of the women with unilateral breast cancer and 17% of the women with CBC had at least one ATM… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(16 reference statements)
3
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, this fraction perfectly correlates with the fraction of Dutch patients with breast cancer who carried AT-causing mutations. 33 The frequency of possibly disease-associated ATM missense alleles, excluding the common D1853N SNP, is approximately 20% in European breast cancer patients, 34 which is again lower than the analogous fraction (35%, 8 of 23; P ϭ 0.05) in this study. The association of ATM missense alleles with cancer has varied between studies.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Interestingly, this fraction perfectly correlates with the fraction of Dutch patients with breast cancer who carried AT-causing mutations. 33 The frequency of possibly disease-associated ATM missense alleles, excluding the common D1853N SNP, is approximately 20% in European breast cancer patients, 34 which is again lower than the analogous fraction (35%, 8 of 23; P ϭ 0.05) in this study. The association of ATM missense alleles with cancer has varied between studies.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…For all patients, ATM mutation analysis was performed using methods as previously described [Broeks et al, 1998[Broeks et al, , 2000[Broeks et al, , 2008. Large genomic deletions and insertions were assessed by MLPA (multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification; kit P041 and P042, MRC-Holland).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods have previously been used to screen for ATM mutations to overcome the complexity of analyzing ATM gene, such as a non-isotopic RNase cleavage-based assay (NIRCA) [29], denaturating gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) [30], single-strand conformational polymorphism (SSCP) [31], denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) [32], and more recently enhanced mismatch mutation analysis (EMMA) [33]. Despite the availability of all these techniques for ATM analysis, Sanger sequencing of the entire coding and flanking sequences of ATM gene remains standard making ATM mutation identification expensive and labor intensive.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%