2002
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20011746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The spectroscopic binaries 21 Her andγGem

Abstract: Abstract. In the framework of a search campaign for short-term oscillations of early-type stars we analysed recently obtained spectroscopic and photometric observations of the early A-type spectroscopic binaries 21 Her and γ Gem. From the radial velocities of 21 Her we derived an improved orbital period and a distinctly smaller eccentricity in comparison with the values known up to now. Moreover, fairly convincing evidence exists for an increase of the orbital period with time. In addition to the orbital motio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each of the 40 echelle orders of each of the 43 spectra were normalized using the continuum task of IRAF 1 . Lehmann et al (2002). The red circles correspond to the measurements by Adelman et al (2015) shifted by −1.4 km s −1 .…”
Section: Spectropolarimetric Observationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Each of the 40 echelle orders of each of the 43 spectra were normalized using the continuum task of IRAF 1 . Lehmann et al (2002). The red circles correspond to the measurements by Adelman et al (2015) shifted by −1.4 km s −1 .…”
Section: Spectropolarimetric Observationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In Fig. 1 we compare the orbital solution derived by Lehmann et al (2002) with the recent radial velocity measurements. The data from Adelman et al (2015) had to be shifted by −1.4 km s −1 to bring it into agreement with the published spectroscopic orbit.…”
Section: Binaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The orbital period of HD 134759, 23.42 y (Heintz 1982), is much longer than 1000 d. It appears doubtful that HD 147869 and HD 196133 are actually Ap stars. Although HD 147869 is listed as an A1p Sr star by Renson & Manfroid (2009), it had been classified as A1 III by Abt & Morrell (1995); Lehmann et al (2002) also regard it as an evolved star rather than a (chemically peculiar) main-sequence star. Renson & Manfroid (2009) note that HD 196133 is perhaps an Am star rather than an Ap star, while Bertaud & Floquet (1967) explicitly state that it is an A2 star without any noticeable peculiarity.…”
Section: Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this connection, Burkhart and Coupry (1991a) stated (based on their study of late A-type stars) that "occurrence of Li-deficient stars is not exceptional without any clearcut division between normal and Am stars." Yet, as far as early A-type stars are concerned, the fact that Li tends to remain almost unaffected in nearnormal stars such as γ Gem (believed to have almost the solar abundances; e.g., Adelman & Philip 1996, Lehmann et al 2002 and π Dra (which were previously considered as normal even though later found to have only weak Am anomaly; cf. Sadakane & Okyudo 1990) might suggest the existence of some connection between the conspicuous Li deficit of α CMa or o Peg and their Am phenomenon.…”
Section: Lithiummentioning
confidence: 99%