2001
DOI: 10.1006/jfan.2001.3751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Spectral Shift Function and the Invariance Principle

Abstract: The new representation formula for the spectral shift function due to F. Gesztesy and K. A. Makarov is considered. This formula is extended to the case of relatively trace class perturbations. The proof is based on the analysis of a certain new unitary invariant for a pair of self-adjoint operators. Academic Press

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this subsection we summarize several results due to A. Pushnitski on the representation of the SSF for a pair of lower-bounded self-adjoint operators (see [8]- [10] …”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this subsection we summarize several results due to A. Pushnitski on the representation of the SSF for a pair of lower-bounded self-adjoint operators (see [8]- [10] …”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The representation of the SSF described in the above theorem has been generalized to non-sign-definite perturbations in [6] in the case of trace-class perturbations, and in [10] in the case of relatively trace-class perturbations. These generalizations are based on the concept of the index of orthogonal projections.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16] for the proof in the case of trace class perturbations; see also [22,23]). For the concept of the Fredholm index for a pair of orthogonal projections we refer to [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [10] this representation was obtained by Gesztesy and Makarov for the case of no-signdefinite perturbations (0.1). Then the Gesztesy Makarov formula (see (1.7)) was extended by Pushnitski [18] to the case when V is not necessarily of the trace class. However, one of the main conditions on H 0 and H(:) in [18] was that there exists a function f, such that f (H(:))& f (H 0 ) is a nuclear operator.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then the Gesztesy Makarov formula (see (1.7)) was extended by Pushnitski [18] to the case when V is not necessarily of the trace class. However, one of the main conditions on H 0 and H(:) in [18] was that there exists a function f, such that f (H(:))& f (H 0 ) is a nuclear operator. In our paper the r.h.s.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%