2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00466-018-1623-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The spectral cell method for wave propagation in heterogeneous materials simulated on multiple GPUs and CPUs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For smooth problems, the FCM exhibits high convergence rates and hence, can compete with the p-FEM [28,71]. The FCM is used in a wide range of application-including geometric nonlinearities [81], hyperelasticity and elastoplasticity at small and finite strains [32][33][34][35]53], structural dynamics [9,23,51,69,76], acoustics [73,77], fracture mechanics [47,70], biomechanics [27,31], homogenization [29,40,60], and Isogeometric Analysis (IGA) [80,81,90].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For smooth problems, the FCM exhibits high convergence rates and hence, can compete with the p-FEM [28,71]. The FCM is used in a wide range of application-including geometric nonlinearities [81], hyperelasticity and elastoplasticity at small and finite strains [32][33][34][35]53], structural dynamics [9,23,51,69,76], acoustics [73,77], fracture mechanics [47,70], biomechanics [27,31], homogenization [29,40,60], and Isogeometric Analysis (IGA) [80,81,90].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the numerical modelling of ultrasonic guided wave propagation in solid media exhibiting discontinuities, such as damage, is complex; it requires fine discretisation and is computationally intensive. Even though methods such as the p-version of the finite element method (p-FEM) [12], the isogeometric analysis (IGA) [13] approach, the spectral cell method (SCM) [14], and the time domain spectral element method (SEM) [15] are more efficient and accurate than the classical FEM with linear elements, they are not efficient enough to be used in inverse methods (about half the number of nodes is required to obtain the same accuracy according to [16]). In the end, calling the objective function for each damage case scenario in which the forward solver is used is unfeasible, because computations for even a simple plate can take up to 1 h.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when decoupled geometrical descriptions as in the SCM or the XFEM are employed, special integration rules are applied for elements intersected by a boundary, thus eliminating the diagonal property of the mass matrix. To recover this quality, Joulaian et al [52] proposed to perform HRZ (Hinton, Rock, and Zienkiewicz) lumping [53], a solution later applied by Giraldo and Restrepo in earthquake modeling [54] and also adopted by Mossaiby et al [55] in a GPU implementation of the SCM. As hypothesized in [52] and confirmed in [56], the lumping procedure might introduce some error which negatively affects the convergence of SE, although it guarantees positiveness of the resulting mass coefficients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%