2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.baae.2017.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The species richness/abundance–area relationship of bees in an early successional tree plantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2009), and, more generally, is in line with broad ecological laws that relate organism diversity and abundance to habitat patch area (Lawton 1999, MacArthur & Wilson 2001, Taki et al . 2018). Large wetlands can provide more microhabitats (Paszkowski & Tonn, 2000) and more open water, and therefore can be more attractive to waterbird species and individuals (Gibbs et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2009), and, more generally, is in line with broad ecological laws that relate organism diversity and abundance to habitat patch area (Lawton 1999, MacArthur & Wilson 2001, Taki et al . 2018). Large wetlands can provide more microhabitats (Paszkowski & Tonn, 2000) and more open water, and therefore can be more attractive to waterbird species and individuals (Gibbs et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two general ecological laws, known as species–area and abundance–area relationships, predict that species richness and organism abundance, respectively, are primarily determined by habitat patch surface area through simple linear regressions on the log–log scale (Lawton 1999, MacArthur & Wilson 2001, Taki et al . 2018). We thus expected water surface area to be a prime predictor of both waterbird abundance and species richness.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No differences among conservation levels were found. Restoration may favour the presence of wild bees (Araújo et al 2018;Taki et al 2018;Alvarenga et al 2020) and parasitoids (Marrec et al 2018), but some hymenopteran assemblages from restored areas may be functionally similar to those from forests (Montoya-Pfeiffer et al 2020), and their diversity has been found to be lower in forests compared to more open areas (Pardo and Gonzalez 2007). Therefore, it seems that, even when the areas labeled as low conservation presented a high degree of perturbation, being embedded into a preserved area matrix helped to increase diversity in these areas, since the hymenopteran diversity is positively affected by the proximity to forest (Banks et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, HCMs can be written using a negative binomial distribution or including random site effects to account for unexplained variations in abundance (Taki et al. , Farr et al. ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that HCMs are flexible both in the way they can handle the structure of the community data (e.g., they can be applied to binary presence/absence using a binomial distribution) but also in how the linear predictors and associated distributions are defined (K ery and Royle 2016). For example, HCMs can be written using a negative binomial distribution or including random site effects to account for unexplained variations in abundance (Taki et al 2018, Farr et al 2019. Similarly, normal (Gaussian) distribution could be used for continuous data .…”
Section: Abundance-based Hcmmentioning
confidence: 99%