2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2008.00293.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The spatialities of contentious politics

Abstract: The question of how space matters to the mobilisation, practices and trajectories of contentious politics has frequently been represented as a politics of scale. Others have focused on place and networks as key spatialities of contentious politics. Yet there are multiple spatialities – scale, place, networks, positionality and mobility – that are implicated in and shape contentious politics. No one of these should be privileged: in practice, participants in contentious politics frequently draw on several at on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
369
0
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 453 publications
(375 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(57 reference statements)
1
369
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, it is important to consider the ways in which cities and regions can be categorized as a 'problem' by the state and those seeking to direct resources to different geographical areas. It is also important not to lose sight of the ways in which 'contentious politics ' (LEITNER et al, 2008) are being played out across the globe. One instance of this in recent years has seen the distinguishing of territorially articulated spaces by those campaigning for devolved government and cultural rights.…”
Section: Towards 'New Localities': the New Regionalism And Relationalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it is important to consider the ways in which cities and regions can be categorized as a 'problem' by the state and those seeking to direct resources to different geographical areas. It is also important not to lose sight of the ways in which 'contentious politics ' (LEITNER et al, 2008) are being played out across the globe. One instance of this in recent years has seen the distinguishing of territorially articulated spaces by those campaigning for devolved government and cultural rights.…”
Section: Towards 'New Localities': the New Regionalism And Relationalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leitner et al (2008) take issue with Tarrow and other social movement researchers who give too much primacy to the role of the nation-state and international institutions. Instead they view contentious politics in terms of its counter-hegemonic underpinnings involving differently positioned participants who join together to promote "alternative imaginaries."…”
Section: Theorising Transnational Advocacy Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They favour an approach which recognises multiple spatialities connecting places, scales, networks, and mobilities, and which examines the ways in which these spatialities are co-implicated in contentious politics. Leitner et al (2008) draw attention to the ways in which power differentials shape the contours of transnational advocacy. As they argue (ibid, 159): "To the extent that contentious politics interacts with the state, the strategies available will be shaped by state-constructed scalar configurations and the different conditions of possibility within local places."…”
Section: Theorising Transnational Advocacy Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Affinity politics therefore allows a greater degree of flexibility and enables activists to find affinity with other groups who may share similar (yet not necessarily identical) beliefs. 6 Likewise, geographers have been quick to highlight many of these spatial complexities (see Cumbers et al, 2008;Leitner et al, 2008;Routledge, 2003 Internal group dynamics are seen to be important for autonomous groups, and there is an attempt to understand how interpersonal relations may mirror existing social patterns of domination. Decisions in these spaces are made through consensus in order to make sure that everyone has a voice and noone feels out of place.…”
Section: Autonomy: a Fiction Romance?mentioning
confidence: 99%