The spatialities of actually existing neoliberalism in glasgow, 1977 to present

Abstract

ABSTRACT. Resisting the temptation to view the neoliberalization of urban policy as unidirectional, pure and hegemonic, this article sets out to make sense of the biography of the process in one city in particular, Glasgow. It attempts to organize, marshall and discipline existing literature on the city's local economic, planning and welfare policies, so as to offer a longitudinal reading of Glasgow's encounter with neoliberal reform across the period 1977 to the present. The article questions whether Glasgow's new political-economic dispensation is capable of stabilizing local capitalist social relations and securing a new local growth trajectory. Space emerges as a critical part of the story. Neoliberalism has interlaced with historical structures, ideologies and policies to produce a range of new hybrid and mutant socio-spatial formations and because it does not amount to a pure and coordinated project these socio-spatial formations contradict and collide as often as they reinforce. Precisely because of the contingent and complicated spatialities it deposits, neoliberalism will continue to struggle to secure a regulatory framework capable of stabilizing local accumulation indefinitely.

Spatial inequalities in life expectancy within postindustrial regions of Europe: a cross-sectional observational study

“…Others have contrasted the UK ‘path destructive’ road to deindustrialisation, characterised by the growth of a low-wage service sector and reduced social protection, with alternative strategies pursued in mainland Europe 24 47. It has been argued that a more rapid adoption of neoliberal politics by local government in WCS alongside greater vulnerability to the deleterious impacts of associated economic policies might provide some basis for explaining the findings for WCS 24 48…”

Neo-liberal or Third Way? What Planners from Glasgow, Melbourne and Toronto Say

“…From the foregoing discussion, it is evident that a number of important distinctions characterise neo-liberal and third-way ideologies though their repercussions have only rarely been tested in the planning literature (Boyle et al 2008, Sager 2009). Table 2 undertakes this task.…”

Sustaining communities: setting the agenda

“…The concept of 'sustaining communities' has been mobilised in myriad ways across academic, political and policy domains, despite the tendency of the term to defy easy definition (Boyle et al 2008;Brownhill and Carpenter 2009;Davies 2002;Raco 2005;Schofield 2002). The idea of sustaining communities is generally thought to be a good one, though the precise means through which it may be achieved often remain opaque.…”