2017
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggx506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The spatial sensitivity of Sp converted waves—scattered-wave kernels and their applications to receiver-function migration and inversion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
6
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is the expected model perturbation for recovery of a discontinuity relative to a homogeneous background and is typical for scattered wave kernel imaging and in agreement with several other studies (Mancinelli & Fischer, 2018;Pearce et al, 2012;Rondenay et al, 2001Rondenay et al, , 2008. Some studies apply a phase shift to the receiver functions in order to recover a single phase centered on the discontinuity for ease of visualisation and interpretation (Hansen & Schmandt, 2017;Hua et al, 2020), whereas other studies report that phase shifting results in further issues with side lobes and instability (Mancinelli & Fischer, 2018). Regardless of how presented, scattered wave kernels such as those presented here recover a change in velocity, rather than the absolute velocity of the layers.…”
Section: Recovery Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is the expected model perturbation for recovery of a discontinuity relative to a homogeneous background and is typical for scattered wave kernel imaging and in agreement with several other studies (Mancinelli & Fischer, 2018;Pearce et al, 2012;Rondenay et al, 2001Rondenay et al, , 2008. Some studies apply a phase shift to the receiver functions in order to recover a single phase centered on the discontinuity for ease of visualisation and interpretation (Hansen & Schmandt, 2017;Hua et al, 2020), whereas other studies report that phase shifting results in further issues with side lobes and instability (Mancinelli & Fischer, 2018). Regardless of how presented, scattered wave kernels such as those presented here recover a change in velocity, rather than the absolute velocity of the layers.…”
Section: Recovery Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Alternatively, it could be related to the smaller number of stacked kernels at depth owing to the size of the array, which could be ameliorated by increasing the array aperture (Mancinelli & Fischer, 2018; Rondenay et al., 2005). Better recovery of shallow structures by S‐to‐P kernels is also reported in the work of Mancinelli and Fischer (2018) and the work of Hansen and Schmandt (2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In prior studies, these spatial functions are either represented by geographic bins of conversion points (e.g., Dueker & Sheehan, 1997; Kind et al, 2012; Rondenay, 2009), or by empirically defined weighting functions that represent Fresnel zones for vertically incident waves (e.g., Lekic et al, 2011; Lekić & Fischer, 2017; Wittlinger & Farra, 2007). However, to incorporate the physics of wave scattering into CCP stacking, these spatial functions should be consistent with the sensitivity kernels that describe how scattering from a point on a velocity discontinuity contributes to an observed converted phase, for example the scattering kernels for Sp and Ps phases (e.g., Bostock et al, 2001; Bostock & Rondenay, 1999; Hansen & Schmandt, 2017; Hua et al, 2020; Mancinelli & Fischer, 2017). This condition is typically not met in prior CCP stacking approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noteworthy that these suggestions are based on the curvature of the Ps kernel. For the Sp kernel, which curves downward, the Ricker will produce a reversed layer above the true interface (Mancinelli & Fischer, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%