1992
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/37/11/009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The spatial distribution of positron-emitting nuclei generated by relativistic light ion beams in organic matter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is often regarded as an undesirable drawback which deteriorates the selective energy deposition due to the more frequent electromagnetic energy losses. However, the production of a minor amount of positron emitting fragments (from target, and, for ions with Z P 5, also from projectile) offers the possibility to monitor in situ and non-invasively the precision of the treatment by means of positron-emission-tomography (PET) (Enghardt et al, 1992). The induced b + -activity distribution is correlated but not proportional to the applied dose.…”
Section: Fragmentation Of Therapeutic Ion Beamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is often regarded as an undesirable drawback which deteriorates the selective energy deposition due to the more frequent electromagnetic energy losses. However, the production of a minor amount of positron emitting fragments (from target, and, for ions with Z P 5, also from projectile) offers the possibility to monitor in situ and non-invasively the precision of the treatment by means of positron-emission-tomography (PET) (Enghardt et al, 1992). The induced b + -activity distribution is correlated but not proportional to the applied dose.…”
Section: Fragmentation Of Therapeutic Ion Beamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is immediately evident that the correlation between the spatial distribution of dose and [3+-activity is not trivial. The reason is the kinematics of the nuclear fragmentation reactions which lead to the production of positron emitters during heavy-ion irradiations [1]. Therefore, the prediction of the [3*-activity distribution from the treatment plan in combination with the time dependence of beam energy, intensity and focus during the irradiation is unavoidable.…”
Section: The Combination Of Pet With the Heavy-ion Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the first attemps to utilize PET for treatment plan verification prior to heavy ion therapy were made at the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory with low-intensity [3+-radioactive ion beams in the 1980s [7] and a radioactive therapy beam is planned for the Japanese HIMAC-facility at Chiba [5]. (ii) As a byproduct of each heavy-ion therapy [3+-radioactive nuclei are formed via fragmentation reactions between the incident particles and the atomic nuclei of the tissue [1 ]. The spatial distribution of these positron emitters within the target volume can be related to the dose distribution [8], which offers the possibility of applying PET-techniques to quality assurance of heavy-ion therapy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…quanta of β+-radioactive ions using positron emission tomography (PET) one can there fore correlate the range distribution with the primary beam in order to localize on-line the beam inside the patient [2].…”
Section: Fig 1 -The Superimposition Of Bragg Curves To Give a Uniformentioning
confidence: 99%