2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2018.06.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The spatial distribution of Mercury's pyroclastic activity and the relation to lithospheric weaknesses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thomas et al () dated pyroclastic deposits associated with volcanic vents across the planet finding a range of activity between 3.9 and 1.7 Ga. Based on these observations, and on the fact that the observed faults cut the vent‐bearing craters and not the vents, the pyroclastic activity along the VEA array overprints the motion of the major faults in this area and is thus younger than 3.7 Ga. On Mercury, the occurrence of volcanic vents is often linked to the presence of faults (e.g., Rothery et al, ; Thomas et al, ), and this is also observed on Earth, where relevant upwelling of hot material (forming volcanoes, geothermal manifestations, and vents) typically happens in correspondence to fault intersections (e.g., Acocella & Funiciello, ). A statistical analysis of vent distribution on Mercury reveals that since fault and impact crater damage zones are pervasive on the planet, there is no strict correlation between vents and faults at a global scale (Klimczak et al, ). However, the vents that we consider in this regional structural context are unequivocally located in correspondence to boundaries of the VEA array sectors, confirming a tight relationship between volcanic activity and major fault segmentation along this array (Figure c).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thomas et al () dated pyroclastic deposits associated with volcanic vents across the planet finding a range of activity between 3.9 and 1.7 Ga. Based on these observations, and on the fact that the observed faults cut the vent‐bearing craters and not the vents, the pyroclastic activity along the VEA array overprints the motion of the major faults in this area and is thus younger than 3.7 Ga. On Mercury, the occurrence of volcanic vents is often linked to the presence of faults (e.g., Rothery et al, ; Thomas et al, ), and this is also observed on Earth, where relevant upwelling of hot material (forming volcanoes, geothermal manifestations, and vents) typically happens in correspondence to fault intersections (e.g., Acocella & Funiciello, ). A statistical analysis of vent distribution on Mercury reveals that since fault and impact crater damage zones are pervasive on the planet, there is no strict correlation between vents and faults at a global scale (Klimczak et al, ). However, the vents that we consider in this regional structural context are unequivocally located in correspondence to boundaries of the VEA array sectors, confirming a tight relationship between volcanic activity and major fault segmentation along this array (Figure c).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of Mercury's explosive volcanic vents are on the floors, rims, central peaks or peak rings of impact structures, on a fault, or within 20 km of a fault (Klimczak et al 2018). These explosive eruptions could not have happened unless there were sufficient volatiles to expand explosively as a gas (Kerber et al 2009).…”
Section: What Are the History And Mechanisms Of Explosive Eruption?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Volcanic vents that straddle a fault are usually regarded as post-dating the fault, in which case the fault is likely to have provided a pathway for magma ascent (e.g., Klimczak et al 2018). The alternative scenarios regarding age relationships between faulting and magmatism can be tested with high-resolution images (e.g., Fig.…”
Section: What Are the Nature Causes And Timing Of Tectonic Features?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the event that metallic volcanoes can be identified using present-day observations, they will likely be very informative. For example, it is likely that volcanoes will be spatially associated with impact craters, analogous to what is seen on Mercury (Klimczak et al, 2018), and the degree of this association will inform the stress evolution of the crust. A rapidly cooling metallic flow may acquire a remanent magnetic field, if an internal dynamo is active at that time (Bryson et al, 2015).…”
Section: Geomorphic Implications and Potential Constraints From Obsermentioning
confidence: 99%