2014
DOI: 10.1214/14-aos1226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The spatial distribution in infinite dimensional spaces and related quantiles and depths

Abstract: This reprint differs from the original in pagination and typographic detail. 1 2 A. CHAKRABORTY AND P. CHAUDHURIare curves or functions and can be modeled as random observations from probability distributions in infinite dimensional spaces. The ECG curves of patients observed over a period of time, the spectrometry curves recorded for a range of wavelengths, the annual temperature curves of different places, etc., are examples of such data. Many of the function spaces, where such data lie, are infinite dimensi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
62
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the last decade, depth has also known much success in functional data analysis, where it measures the centrality of a function with respect to a sample of functional data. Some instances are the band depth (López-Pintado and Romo, 2009), the functional halfspace depth (Claeskens et al, 2014) and the functional spatial depth (Chakraborty and Chaudhuri, 2014). The large variety of available depths made it necessary to introduce an axiomatic approach identifying the most desirable properties of a depth function; see Zuo and Serfling (2000) in the multivariate case and Nieto- Reyes and Battey (2016) in the functional one.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decade, depth has also known much success in functional data analysis, where it measures the centrality of a function with respect to a sample of functional data. Some instances are the band depth (López-Pintado and Romo, 2009), the functional halfspace depth (Claeskens et al, 2014) and the functional spatial depth (Chakraborty and Chaudhuri, 2014). The large variety of available depths made it necessary to introduce an axiomatic approach identifying the most desirable properties of a depth function; see Zuo and Serfling (2000) in the multivariate case and Nieto- Reyes and Battey (2016) in the functional one.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conditional spatial depth SD(y | x) of a point y ∈ H given X = x is defined as SD(y | x) = 1 − S(y | x) (cf. [8]). Defining the conditional depth in the above way ensures that a point near the center of the conditional distribution of the response has higher depth than a point at the peripheral regions of the conditional distribution, and also that the conditional depth lies between 0 and 1.…”
Section: Conditional Spatial Depth and Quantilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spatial depth for multivariate data was developed in [42] and [37], based on the ideas of spatial quantiles in [12] and [28]. The concept of spatial depth is extended to infinite dimensional data in [8]. In [38], multivariate spatial depth was employed in a functional data context by first discretizing the sample curves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimation of the covariance operator of a stochastic process is a very important topic in FDA, which helps to understand the fluctuations of a random element, as well as to derive the principal functional components from its spectrum. Several robust and non-robust estimators have been proposed, see for instance Chakraborty and Chaudhuri (2014) and the references therein. In order to perform RFM, we introduce a new robust estimator to use for each of the m subsamples, which can be implemented using parallel computing.…”
Section: Robust Fusion For the Covariance Operatormentioning
confidence: 99%