2023
DOI: 10.1007/s00244-023-01000-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Spatial Distribution and Potential Risk Assessment of POPs in Farmland around a Typical E-Waste Dismantling Site

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 63 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, no NMs or JD37 (group P); (2) 1000 mg/kg α-Fe 2 O 3 NMs (group F); (3) 1.5 × 10 9 CFU/plant JD37 (group J); and (4) 1000 mg/kg α-Fe 2 O 3 with 1.5 × 10 9 CFU/plant JD37 (group FJ). Each pot contained 2 kg of dry soil spiked with 0.5 mg/kg PCB101 based on the reported environmentally relevant concentrations. In detail, a small amount of clean air-dried soil was homogeneously mixed with a stock solution of PCB101 prepared in acetone and then diluted using clean soil step by step to the required experimental concentration. The amended soil was stabilized for 7 days after sufficient watering.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, no NMs or JD37 (group P); (2) 1000 mg/kg α-Fe 2 O 3 NMs (group F); (3) 1.5 × 10 9 CFU/plant JD37 (group J); and (4) 1000 mg/kg α-Fe 2 O 3 with 1.5 × 10 9 CFU/plant JD37 (group FJ). Each pot contained 2 kg of dry soil spiked with 0.5 mg/kg PCB101 based on the reported environmentally relevant concentrations. In detail, a small amount of clean air-dried soil was homogeneously mixed with a stock solution of PCB101 prepared in acetone and then diluted using clean soil step by step to the required experimental concentration. The amended soil was stabilized for 7 days after sufficient watering.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%