2015
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/815/1/21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

THE SPATIAL CLUSTERING OFROSATALL-SKY SURVEY ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI. IV. MORE MASSIVE BLACK HOLES RESIDE IN MORE MASSIVE DARK MATTER HALOS

Abstract: This is the fourth paper in a series that reports on our investigation of the clustering properties of active galactic nuclei (AGNs) identified in the ROSAT All-Sky Survey and Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). In this paper we investigate the cause of the X-ray luminosity dependence of the clustering of broad-line, luminous AGNs at z 0.16 0.36. < Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
61
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
(221 reference statements)
3
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future observations and modelling can reduce uncertainties in bolometric corrections and the contribution of obscured accretion. They can also test our predictions against direct observations of the (non)-evolving M bh -Mstar relation (Suh et al 2019, submitted), AGN and quasar clustering (e.g., Shankar et al 2010), and the cross-correlation of AGN and galaxies (e.g., Krumpe et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Future observations and modelling can reduce uncertainties in bolometric corrections and the contribution of obscured accretion. They can also test our predictions against direct observations of the (non)-evolving M bh -Mstar relation (Suh et al 2019, submitted), AGN and quasar clustering (e.g., Shankar et al 2010), and the cross-correlation of AGN and galaxies (e.g., Krumpe et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Assuming a bolometric correction, the specific BHAR can be considered as a proxy of the Eddington ratio (Equation 1). Krumpe et al (2015) found no statistically significant clustering dependence on λ Edd for RASS Type 1 AGN at 0.16 < z < 0.36. Our results suggest the same constant bias evolution with Eddington ratio for both RASS Type 1 and COSMOS Type 2 AGN at different redshifts.…”
Section: Clustering Dependence On λ Bhar and Sfrmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…These results indicate that the existence of an active SMBH does no seem to affect the clustering properties of the galaxy it lives in. Previous clustering studies that used X-ray and optically-selected AGN found a weak clustering dependence on black hole mass and no significant dependence on Eddington ratio (Krumpe et al 2015). Therefore, the AGN clustering seems to be (nearly) independent of the AGN properties, but it depends on the properties of the host galaxy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%