1974
DOI: 10.1080/00323267408401466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The spatial approach to electoral analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Important to this earlier work was empirically demonstrating the importance of a spatial approach for electoral analysis (McPhail, 1974), captured in the composition versus context debate. Those in the Reynolds (1990), see also Forest (2018) Leib and Quinton (2011) Agnew (1990) Nicley ( 2011) former camp argued that we best understand spatialised voting patterns by looking at the composition of individual characteristics in an area, with any remaining variance likely to be so small it can be safely classed as epiphenomenal (King, 1996).…”
Section: The Research Threadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Important to this earlier work was empirically demonstrating the importance of a spatial approach for electoral analysis (McPhail, 1974), captured in the composition versus context debate. Those in the Reynolds (1990), see also Forest (2018) Leib and Quinton (2011) Agnew (1990) Nicley ( 2011) former camp argued that we best understand spatialised voting patterns by looking at the composition of individual characteristics in an area, with any remaining variance likely to be so small it can be safely classed as epiphenomenal (King, 1996).…”
Section: The Research Threadsmentioning
confidence: 99%