2020
DOI: 10.1093/ae/tmaa009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Soybean Aphid Suction Trap Network: Sampling the Aerobiological “Soup”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Soybean thrips were captured in 2018 by the Suction Trap Network [22], which is located in Illinois (Freeport, Monmouth, Morris and Urbana-Champaign), Iowa (Ames, Kanawha, Nashua and Sutherland), Kansas (Manhattan), Louisiana (Chase), Michigan (Kellogg and Monroe), Minnesota (Lamberton, Morris and Rosemount), Missouri (Columbia), and Wisconsin (Arlington, Eau Claire and Hancock). Thrips were manually selected from the suction traps, transferred to 95% ethanol, and stored at −20 • C. Soybean thrips were identified based on the morphological characteristics included in Hoddle et al [23].…”
Section: Collection and Processing Of Soybean Thrips Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soybean thrips were captured in 2018 by the Suction Trap Network [22], which is located in Illinois (Freeport, Monmouth, Morris and Urbana-Champaign), Iowa (Ames, Kanawha, Nashua and Sutherland), Kansas (Manhattan), Louisiana (Chase), Michigan (Kellogg and Monroe), Minnesota (Lamberton, Morris and Rosemount), Missouri (Columbia), and Wisconsin (Arlington, Eau Claire and Hancock). Thrips were manually selected from the suction traps, transferred to 95% ethanol, and stored at −20 • C. Soybean thrips were identified based on the morphological characteristics included in Hoddle et al [23].…”
Section: Collection and Processing Of Soybean Thrips Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Russian wheat aphid) and Aphis glycines Matsumura (soybean aphid), each of which had initially large populations that declined apparently due to the effects of natural enemies and other factors (Davis et al, 2014;Lagos-Kutz et al, 2020). However, we emphasize TA B L E 1 Covariate effects on species-level aphid abundance trends based on model averaging of the AIC c -best generalized linear mixed-effect models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from the central USA (hereafter referred to as “Central”), were obtained from 53 suction trap sites with 85 aphid species identified between 2005 and 2019 by D. Voegtlin and D. Lagos‐Kutz. Central suction traps stand 5.8 m above the ground and sample 60 m 3 of air per minute (Lagos‐Kutz et al, 2020). The Central dataset is currently supported by the University of Georgia Center for Invasive Species and Ecosystem Health (“Bugwood Center”) as part of the Southern IPM Center's IPM Information Supplement funded by the US Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…PGbased pitfall traps were also proposed as a standard and minimally disturbing method to investigate the subterranean fauna of the mesovoid shallow substratum (López and Oromí 2010; emptied every six months). Since 2001, PG fixation is applied by the Soybean Aphid Suction Trap Network (STN;Lagos-Kutz et al 2020) for monitoring the 'aerobiological soup'. In the context of environmental genomic studies, Matos-Maraví et al (2019) proposed PG as the fixative of choice for mass samples originating from pitfall traps and flight interceptions, but neither tests nor metadata had been published along with this statement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%