2002
DOI: 10.1375/twin.5.5.456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Southern California Twin Register at the University of Southern California

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These include measures obtained through child and caregiver interviews, as well as laboratory observations, teacher reports, and school records. Additional measures of social and biological risk factors are also obtained but described elsewhere (Baker et al 2002, 2006, 2007). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These include measures obtained through child and caregiver interviews, as well as laboratory observations, teacher reports, and school records. Additional measures of social and biological risk factors are also obtained but described elsewhere (Baker et al 2002, 2006, 2007). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twins and their families were ascertained primarily through local schools, both public and private, in Los Angeles and the surrounding communities (see Baker et al 2002 for a detailed description). Qualifications for the study were based on age of the twins (9 or 10 years old at the time of initial assessment), their English proficiency (a stanine score of at least 3.0 on a standardized test of English proficiency), and availability to participate in a 6–8 h laboratory assessment on any day of the week.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Informed consent and assent were obtained from all participants. More details on the protocol procedures and zygosity determination can be found elsewhere (Baker, Barton, Lozano, Raine, & Fowler, 2006; Baker, Barton, & Raine, 2002; Baker et al, 2013). Complete data on one or more waves of aggression and wave 4 conditioning were available for 329 participants.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data collection for the project occurred across five waves, with the first (Wave 1 [W1]) occurring during 2000-2004 when participants were 9 to 10 years of age, and subsequent waves occurring every 2 to 3 years thereafter, with W3, W4, and W5 occurring at ages 14 to 15, 16 to 18, and 19 to 20, respectively. Additional participants were recruited at W3 to be representative of the greater Los Angeles area in terms of race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status (for further details regarding sample characteristics; see Baker et al (2002) and Baker et al (2006) for details regarding recruitment and study inclusion criteria). The total W3 sample consisted of 1,185 youth with a mean age of 14.87 years (SD = .87), of whom 51.2% were female.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%