2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2009.12.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The South Tibet detachment shear zone in the Dinggye areaTime constraints on extrusion models of the Himalayas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
111
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
4
111
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…North of the MFT, the décollement of the Indian basement is thought to extend with flat geometry beneath the Lesser Himalaya and to form a steeper ramp at the front of the High Himalaya (Lavé and Avouac 2000). The MBT is a series of thrusts that separate the Lesser Himalaya sediments from the Tertiary Siwalik sedimentary belt (e.g., Leloup et al 2010;Ni and Barazangi 1984). The MCT is a series of thrusts separating the High Himalaya from the Lesser Himalaya (ibid.).…”
Section: Tectonics and Setting Of Receiver Faultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…North of the MFT, the décollement of the Indian basement is thought to extend with flat geometry beneath the Lesser Himalaya and to form a steeper ramp at the front of the High Himalaya (Lavé and Avouac 2000). The MBT is a series of thrusts that separate the Lesser Himalaya sediments from the Tertiary Siwalik sedimentary belt (e.g., Leloup et al 2010;Ni and Barazangi 1984). The MCT is a series of thrusts separating the High Himalaya from the Lesser Himalaya (ibid.).…”
Section: Tectonics and Setting Of Receiver Faultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This confirms the view that NSTR is probably the result of N-S contraction [29] and provides unequivocal evidence for the transformation of tectonic regime. In order to accurately constrain the time of the transformation of tectonic regime from N-S extension to N-S contraction, we summarize and analyze the ages of STDS and NSTRs in Gyirong and other areas in Himalayan orogen ( Figure 7) [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][12][13][14][15][16][17]22,28,[30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48]. The result shows that the STDS was active from ca.…”
Section: Middle-miocene Transformation Of Tectonic Regime In Himalayamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this time, the regime of N-S extension was dominant. When the India-Asia convergence speeded up, the Himalaya experienced a rapid deformation, resulting in Figure 8 Statistical diagram of the U-Pb/U-(Th)-Pb ages of leucogranites and 40 Ar/ 39 Ar ages of leucogranites and metasedimentary rocks in Himalayan orogen (data from [1,[4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][15][16][17][18][22][23][24]30,). the thrusting and shorting.…”
Section: Geodynamic Implications On the Transformation Of Tectonic Rementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some studies have suggested deformation linked with the STDS could have migrated upwards prior to localize in the top to the north South Tibet Detachment (STD) shear zone [14,25]. Because this hypothesis has major bearings not only on the history of the STD shear zone but also on the mechanics of the Himalayan range building and on the mechanics of low angle detachment in general, it deserves to be investigated in more details.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%