2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:mebr.0000027424.86587.74
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The South Africa Stress and Health Study: Rationale and Design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
85
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study rationale and methods have been described in detail previously (Williams et al, 2004). The survey protocol, including all recruitment, consent and field procedures, was approved by the Human Subjects Committees of the University of Michigan, Harvard Medical School, and by a single project assurance of compliance from the Medical University of South Africa that was approved by the National Institute of Mental Health (USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study rationale and methods have been described in detail previously (Williams et al, 2004). The survey protocol, including all recruitment, consent and field procedures, was approved by the Human Subjects Committees of the University of Michigan, Harvard Medical School, and by a single project assurance of compliance from the Medical University of South Africa that was approved by the National Institute of Mental Health (USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SASH study was a national probability sample of 4351 adult South Africans living in both households and hostel quarters (Williams et al 2004). Hostel quarters were included to maximize coverage of young working-age males.…”
Section: Methods Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SASH study was a national probability sample of 4,351 adult South Africans living in both households and hostel quarters Williams et al, 2004).…”
Section: Participants and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Field interviewers made up to three attempts to contact each respondent, and the overall response rate was 85.5%. The SASH data set includes person-level analysis weights that incorporate sample selection, nonresponse, and poststratification factors (Williams et al, 2004(Williams et al, , 2008. This weight was used in computing estimates of descriptive statistics for the survey population (e.g., estimates of population means and proportions) and for estimation of analytical statistics (e.g., regression coeffi cients) required in modeling relationships among variables in the survey population.…”
Section: Participants and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%