Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2019
DOI: 10.1101/758730
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The sources and transmission routes of microbial populations throughout a meat processing facility

Abstract: Microbial food spoilage is responsible for a considerable amount of waste and can cause food-borne diseases in humans, particularly in immunocompromised individuals and children. Therefore, preventing microbial food spoilage is a major concern for health authorities, regulators, consumers, and the food industry.However, the contamination of food products is difficult to control because there are several potential sources during production, processing, storage, distribution, and consumption, where microorganism… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Starting from version 4.1, FoodMicrobionet includes, as an external resource (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6954040), R lists containing the ASV for all studies processed using the dada2 pipeline (Parente et al, 2022). Although the ecological significance of ASV is not clear (i.e., there is no convincing proof that they represent different subpopulations within a taxonomic group) they have been used to evaluate microdiversity in some studies (Quijada et al, 2018; Skeie et al, 2019; Zwirzitz et al, 2020). Their main advantage, however, is that results from different studies can be compared, something which is impossible when using Operational Taxonomic Units (Callahan et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Starting from version 4.1, FoodMicrobionet includes, as an external resource (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6954040), R lists containing the ASV for all studies processed using the dada2 pipeline (Parente et al, 2022). Although the ecological significance of ASV is not clear (i.e., there is no convincing proof that they represent different subpopulations within a taxonomic group) they have been used to evaluate microdiversity in some studies (Quijada et al, 2018; Skeie et al, 2019; Zwirzitz et al, 2020). Their main advantage, however, is that results from different studies can be compared, something which is impossible when using Operational Taxonomic Units (Callahan et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also analyzed the bacteria in these samples (n = 439), which were from conveyor belts, equipment surfaces, knives, aprons, gloves, etc. (Supplementary Table S3) in plants in Austria, USA, Italy, and Canada (Yang et al, 2016;Botta et al, 2020;Zwirzitz et al, 2020Zwirzitz et al, , 2021Shedleur-Bourguignon et al, 2023; Supplementary Table S2). Like after-cleaning samples, three bacterial genera including Pseudomonas (9.7%), Psychrobacter (9.6%), and Acinetobacter (6.2%) also had average relative abundance of >5% in before-cleaning samples (Supplementary Table S4).…”
Section: Bacteria In Meat Processing Environment Before Cleaning or D...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cieľom našej práce bolo sledovanie mikrobiologickej kontaminácie sous vide hovädzieho mäsa po aplikácii rozmarínovej rastlinnej silice v kombinácii s baktériou S. (Sarantópoulos et al, 2002). Výsledkom je anaeróbne prostredie, ktoré predlžuje trvanlivosť hovädzieho mäsa počas prepravy (Zwirzitz et al, 2019). Kaziace baktérie na hovädzom mäse však prispievajú k zmenám v štruktúre mäsa, farbe a chuti, čo ho robí neprijateľným pre ľudskú spotrebu (Mills et al, 2014).…”
Section: šTatistické Vyhodnotenie Výsledkovunclassified