2002
DOI: 10.1002/gea.10043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The source of raw materials for Roman pottery from Leptiminus, Tunisia

Abstract: Leptiminus, a Roman port city on the west coast of Tunisia, North Africa, exported olive oil and a garum fish paste to Rome. Excavations have uncovered many facilities including kilns and a potter's workshop, indicating an extensive ceramic industry. The vessels, manufactured at Leptiminus, included African red‐slip fineware, coarseware, and amphorae. A petrographic study of pottery sherds showed them to contain very similar temper, rounded aeolian sand grains and limestone, but varying in proportions to produ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(7 reference statements)
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the ''Criterion of Abundance'' those ceramics that are chemically distinct from the majority are assumed to be imports (Bishop et al 1982: 300-301). However, several studies have sought to empirically connect finished ceramic vessels with the area in which they were produced by attempting to locate clays and compare their chemical signatures with those of archaeological ceramics (Adan-Bayewitz and Perlman 1985; Bartlett et al 2000;Dorais et al 2004;Hein et al 2004;Neff et al 1992;Phillips and Morgenstein 2002;Sharratt et al 2009;Sherriff et al 2002;Strazicich 1998;Vaughn and Neff 2004). Such comparisons are not straightforward.…”
Section: Geochemical Studies Of Ceramic Exchange In the Archaeologicamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the ''Criterion of Abundance'' those ceramics that are chemically distinct from the majority are assumed to be imports (Bishop et al 1982: 300-301). However, several studies have sought to empirically connect finished ceramic vessels with the area in which they were produced by attempting to locate clays and compare their chemical signatures with those of archaeological ceramics (Adan-Bayewitz and Perlman 1985; Bartlett et al 2000;Dorais et al 2004;Hein et al 2004;Neff et al 1992;Phillips and Morgenstein 2002;Sharratt et al 2009;Sherriff et al 2002;Strazicich 1998;Vaughn and Neff 2004). Such comparisons are not straightforward.…”
Section: Geochemical Studies Of Ceramic Exchange In the Archaeologicamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent petrographic studies (Bonifay et al 2002(Bonifay et al , 2010a(Bonifay et al , 2011Sherriff et al 2002;Capelli 2005aCapelli ,b, 2007Ghalia et al 2005;Capelli et al 2006;Capelli and Bonifay 2007;Gandolfi In contrast, there is a general scarcity of chemical analyses on these production centres, apart from a few-mainly unpublished-early studies (Liddy 1985;Taylor 1993;Taylor et al 1997;Sherriff et al 2002) that have not been continued in recent years. From the chemical-petrographic information obtained in this study and its comparison to the information available from different workshops, along with the typological evidence, a provenance hypothesis can be proposed for most of the analysed samples (Table 3).…”
Section: African Amphoraementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polished thin sections of all samples were prepared for optical analysis using a conventional light microscope, and all sherds showed a uniform texture and mineralogy with temper clasts of quartz, calcite, and grog, identical to that described by Sherriff et al (2002).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%