2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2022.107709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The source, fate, and transport of arsenic in the Yellowstone hydrothermal system - An overview

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 124 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several other significant correlates to the NMDS ordination including silica (Si; R 2 = 0.45, p < 0.001), magnesium (Mg 2+ ; R 2 = 0.39, p < 0.001), potassium (K + ; R 2 = 0.37, p < 0.001), calcium (Ca 2+ ; R 2 = 0.23, p < 0.01), Cl − ( R 2 = 0.23, p < 0.01), sodium (Na + ; R 2 = 0.19, p < 0.01), and arsenic (As; R 2 = 0.18, p < 0.05) concentrations exhibited variation that was largely associated with differences in YNP and Iceland hot spring communities (Figure 3; Supplementary Figure 7). Again, such variation potentially reflects differences in high‐temperature water‐rock interactions that occur in the aquifers sourcing these springs that are hosted in rhyolitic (Si, Cl and As) or basaltic bedrock (Mg and Ca) (Arnórsson, 1995; McCleskey et al, 2022; Planer‐Friedrich et al, 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several other significant correlates to the NMDS ordination including silica (Si; R 2 = 0.45, p < 0.001), magnesium (Mg 2+ ; R 2 = 0.39, p < 0.001), potassium (K + ; R 2 = 0.37, p < 0.001), calcium (Ca 2+ ; R 2 = 0.23, p < 0.01), Cl − ( R 2 = 0.23, p < 0.01), sodium (Na + ; R 2 = 0.19, p < 0.01), and arsenic (As; R 2 = 0.18, p < 0.05) concentrations exhibited variation that was largely associated with differences in YNP and Iceland hot spring communities (Figure 3; Supplementary Figure 7). Again, such variation potentially reflects differences in high‐temperature water‐rock interactions that occur in the aquifers sourcing these springs that are hosted in rhyolitic (Si, Cl and As) or basaltic bedrock (Mg and Ca) (Arnórsson, 1995; McCleskey et al, 2022; Planer‐Friedrich et al, 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reduced arsenic species (e.g. arsenite) are particularly abundant in alkaline-chloride hot springs of YNP and are a consequence of water–rock interaction in the hydrothermal aquifer that is hosted in rhyolitic bedrock ( 71 , 72 ). Thus, the capacity to use reduced arsenic species as an electron donor may be a unique adaptation of the dominant autotrophic populations ( Thermocrinis ) inhabiting geysers that are sourced by the deep hydrothermal aquifer in YNP.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High arsenic concentrations at these sites may be influenced by deep mantle mixing [26] and carbonate concentrations in groundwater [54]. Relationships between high arsenic and travertine have been found throughout the western United States, including Mammoth Hot Springs in Yellowstone National Park of Wyoming [55] and Montezuma Well located in the Verde Valley of Arizona [56,57] Groundwater in Arizona, like much of the southwestern United States, has elevated arsenic concentrations when compared to the rest of the United States [14]. In drinking-water wells in the southwestern United States, arsenic was found to exceed the MCL more than twice as frequently than in drinking-water wells in the United States as a whole [52].…”
Section: Assessment Of Arsenic In Groundwater In the Grand Canyon Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High arsenic concentrations at these sites may be influenced by deep mantle mixing[26] and carbonate concentrations in groundwater[54]. Relationships between high arsenic and travertine have been found throughout the western United States, including Mammoth Hot Springs in Yellowstone National Park of Wyoming[55] and Montezuma Well located in the Verde Valley of Arizona[56,57], and likely represent groundwater mixing with deep-earth hydrothermal fluids containing elevated arsenic concentrations [41]. Other groundwater sites with elevated arsenic concentrations do not have a clear source.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%