2016
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.68.2476
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Sound of Silence: A Proxy for Platinum Toxicity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors noted that among 488 men treated with CBCT, 80% had a hearing loss according to the ASHA criteria, of whom 18% had a severe to profound hearing loss. In agreement with the accompanying editorial comment [10], we question whether the ASHA criteria are adequate for the identification of a clinical significant hearing loss, and to what degree CBCT contributes to the age-related hearing loss. The aims of the present longitudinal study were to evaluate (1) hearing threshold levels (HTLs) in audiograms pretreatment, during chemotherapy and at follow-up survey, (2) audiogramdefined hearing loss according to different criteria and (3) self-reported hearing impairment and tinnitus at survey in 46 men treated for TC with CBCT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The authors noted that among 488 men treated with CBCT, 80% had a hearing loss according to the ASHA criteria, of whom 18% had a severe to profound hearing loss. In agreement with the accompanying editorial comment [10], we question whether the ASHA criteria are adequate for the identification of a clinical significant hearing loss, and to what degree CBCT contributes to the age-related hearing loss. The aims of the present longitudinal study were to evaluate (1) hearing threshold levels (HTLs) in audiograms pretreatment, during chemotherapy and at follow-up survey, (2) audiogramdefined hearing loss according to different criteria and (3) self-reported hearing impairment and tinnitus at survey in 46 men treated for TC with CBCT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Such characterization is important to develop risk-stratified, evidence-based follow-up recommendations. Moreover, as noted previously, 8 a better understanding of AHOs may help to guide testicular cancer management, especially in the controversial area of whether good-risk patients should receive EP 3 4 or BEP 3 3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In a curable disease such as testicular cancer with a long life expectancy and equivalent therapy options, the availability of AHO data becomes increasingly important to inform treatment decisions. 8 The striking association between CBM score and self-reported health indicates that the score captures outcomes that affect patients' self-perception of health. The risk of worse self-reported health among patients with very high/severe CBM scores rose to .…”
Section: Jcoorgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8 Given the curative potential of these commonly used regimens, it has become increasingly important to understand the occurrence of long-term adverse health outcomes (AHOs). As recently pointed out by Oldenburg and Gietema, 9 better characterization of AHOs may also help guide TC treatment, especially in the controversial area of whether patients with good-risk TC should receive EPX4 or BEPX3. However, no series to date has quantified the type and prevalence of long-term AHOs in large numbers of patients treated with EPX4, BEPX3, or BEPX4.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because alterations in the successful TC regimens are unlikely, our results underscore the importance of continued follow-up of TCSs to determine the extent to which AHOs might increase as the cohort matures. 9 Similarly, ongoing genetic research to broaden our understanding of the biologic basis and causal pathways of cisplatin-associated AHOs 44,45,59 is needed to form the foundation for the development of preventive and interventional strategies. Although increasing numbers of AHOs were associated with a significant decline in self-reported health, 2 ) for one (n = 288), two (n = 185), and three (n = 84) AHOs compared with no AHOs were 1.14 (95% CI, 0.87 to 1.49), P = .34; 1.48 (95% CI, 1.11 to 1.97), P = .01; and 1.46 (95% CI, 1.002 to 2.13), P = .05.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%