2010
DOI: 10.1080/17439881003671128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The sound of feedback in higher education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This strengthens the epistemological reasoning for dialogic feedback. As the field has been criticized for lacking theoretical underpinning (Baird et al, 2014;Savin-Baden, 2010), this is a valuable contribution.…”
Section: Overall Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This strengthens the epistemological reasoning for dialogic feedback. As the field has been criticized for lacking theoretical underpinning (Baird et al, 2014;Savin-Baden, 2010), this is a valuable contribution.…”
Section: Overall Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although teacher-student contact can be supplemented by communication with information technologies (e.g. podcasting technology for the provision of audio feedback on assignments; see Savin-Baden 2010), such communication needs to be based on sound pedagogic principles to make the learning support sufficient and relevant to students' needs (Savin-Baden 2010).…”
Section: Establishing Close and Trusting Relationships With Studentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two main benefits of audio feedback on social media can be inferred from the above excerpt. First, it was more efficient for the teacher (Rotheram, 2009). The audio feedback relieved Rosa from having to type written comments, which enabled her to deliver the feedback within a few minutes.…”
Section: Rosa's Accidental Use and Features Of Audio Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practical terms, 1 min of audio feedback may carry information equivalent to 6 min of written feedback (Lunt and Curran, 2010), which provide a comparatively more indepth assessment of the students' work than written comments (Gould and Day, 2013). Although this figure has been contested considering the time taken to save and upload the audio files (Morris and Chikwa, 2016), the faculty will find the audio feedback to be more time-efficient only if the teachers are technically literate, speak quickly, and use a convenient method for delivering the audio file (Rotheram, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%