2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2005.05.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Soterion Rapid Triage System: Evaluation of inter-rater reliability and validity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
30
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…15 The Soterion Rapid Triage System is another five-level computerized triage system that has been evaluated in two studies. 16,18 The studies reported excellent interrater agreement when the system was applied to 422 adult patients (weighted k, 0.87; 95% CI = 0.84 to 0.91) and to 117 pediatric patients (weighted k, 0.90; 95% CI = 0.83 to 0.96). The tool that has been the most commonly studied is the e-TRIAGE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…15 The Soterion Rapid Triage System is another five-level computerized triage system that has been evaluated in two studies. 16,18 The studies reported excellent interrater agreement when the system was applied to 422 adult patients (weighted k, 0.87; 95% CI = 0.84 to 0.91) and to 117 pediatric patients (weighted k, 0.90; 95% CI = 0.83 to 0.96). The tool that has been the most commonly studied is the e-TRIAGE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[15][16][17] Among them, the Soterion Rapid Triage system is a five-level triage tool initially developed for adults but also applicable to children. Studies revealed a high agreement between nurses for triage of adults (weighted k, 0.87) 16 and pediatric patients (weighted k, 0.90). 18 The other computerized triage tool previously evaluated is the e-TRIAGE.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 Other triage tools have been evaluated in different settings; among them, was the Soterion Rapid Triage System, a five-level computerized triage tool. 20 In this study by Maningas et al, 21 a research nurse performed a second triage blinded to the first evaluation on patients younger than 13 years. The study reported an impressive weighted kappa score of 0.90 (95% CI = 0.83 to 0.96) for the 117 patients evaluated by two nurses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Grafstein and colleagues found high reliability with PC-linked triage, in which each presenting complaint was linked to one or more specific CTAS levels, thus directing the triage nurse toward the preferred triage levels for each complaint type. 8,26 Using this approach, the study nurse performed the second triage while observing the duty nurse's triage assessment; they independently input their determination of the triage score into a computer. Although blinded to the duty nurse's triage score, the study nurse did not perform an independent assessment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maningas and colleagues found excellent reliability among independent users of the Soterion Rapid Triage System, a complaint-driven, algorithm-based computerized triage system. 26 Currently, clinical applications of all major nationally recognized triage systems, including CTAS, the Australasian Triage Scale, 27 the Emergency Severity Index in the United States 19,20 and the Manchester Triage Scale in the United Kingdom, 28 are based on training, memory and experience. In the current ED environment, triage nurses cannot be expected to refer to the paper version during actual clinical shifts or to accurately recall the entire contents from memory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%