2015
DOI: 10.1042/bj20150612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The solution structures of native and patient monomeric human IgA1 reveal asymmetric extended structures: implications for function and IgAN disease

Abstract: Detailed analytical ultracentrifugation and X-ray/neutron scattering data and a new atomistic modelling approach revealed asymmetric extended solution structures for human IgA1 that account for its receptor-binding function. IgA1 with different hinge O-galactosylation patterns showed similar structures.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our current (and third) strategy in SASSIE started from an energy-minimized structure, used rapid Monte Carlo sampling methods on a high-performance computing platform, rejected structures with poor stereochemistry at the point of generation, and employed an integrated modeling workflow for scattering fits (22). In this way, human IgG2 antibody was modeled from SANS data, and human IgA1 antibody likewise from SAXS and SANS data sets (13,65). This third approach will enable more ambitious modeling of antibody solution structures in the future, whether this will be to determine new types of structures or to monitor conformational changes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our current (and third) strategy in SASSIE started from an energy-minimized structure, used rapid Monte Carlo sampling methods on a high-performance computing platform, rejected structures with poor stereochemistry at the point of generation, and employed an integrated modeling workflow for scattering fits (22). In this way, human IgG2 antibody was modeled from SANS data, and human IgA1 antibody likewise from SAXS and SANS data sets (13,65). This third approach will enable more ambitious modeling of antibody solution structures in the future, whether this will be to determine new types of structures or to monitor conformational changes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This modeling procedure raises the issue of how to interpret the resulting conformations. Previously, principal component analyses were used to identify four distinct clusters of structures that defined the asymmetric solution structure of human IgA1 (65). Here, the alternative representation of the fitted solution structures based on plots of abs(d2 À d3) vs. d1 resulted in two different conformations, termed Clusters a and b, that gave indistinguishable scattering fits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, in order to probe the conformation of entire IgA monomers rather than the separate Fab and Fc regions, lower resolution techniques, including electron microscopy (EM), and more recently, X-ray and neutron scattering of IgA in solution, have been used. These have been useful in predicting the overall dimensions of IgA molecules, and have led to an understanding that the IgA1 has a greater average Fab centre to Fab centre distance than IgA2: 16.9 nm for IgA1 compared with just 8.2 nm for IgA2 [21][22][23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Structure Of Monomeric Igamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SasCalc (golden vector method) [35] allows the computation of neutron scattering profiles from structures and it can be freely accessed from a website [36]. Examples of this methodology are published in the literature [29], [34], [37], [38], [39], [40]. In the absence of crystallographic data, there are tools to generate molecular shapes that fit the experimental data, such as DAMMIF [41].…”
Section: Overview Of Small-angle Neutron Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 99%