1998
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The solution structure of the Leu22 → Val mutant AREA DNA binding domain complexed with a TGATAG core element defines a role for hydrophobic packing in the determination of specificity 1 1Edited by P. E. Wright

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(59 reference statements)
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This strain expresses a Zn-finger mutant of WC-2 in which two basic residues implicated in DNA binding were replaced by acidic residues ( Fig. 1G; Starich et al 1998). WC-2 RK/DD did not support expression of FRQ ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This strain expresses a Zn-finger mutant of WC-2 in which two basic residues implicated in DNA binding were replaced by acidic residues ( Fig. 1G; Starich et al 1998). WC-2 RK/DD did not support expression of FRQ ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like Gln3, the AREA and cGATA-1 proteins are GATA-binding proteins (Orkin 1992;Merika and Orkin 1993;Ko and Engel 1993;Ravagnani et al 1997;Scazzocchio 2000). To our advantage, 3D structures of AREA and cGATA-1 in complexes with their GATA DNA target sites have been determined using NMR methods (Merika and Orkin 1993;Omichinski et al 1993a,b;Stahl and Gronenborn 1993;Starich et al 1998;Kotaka et al 2008;Scazzocchio 2000).…”
Section: Identification Of a Gln3 Sequence With The Characteristics Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…areA mutations in the DNA-binding domain that differentially affect the expression of a number of genes have been described. Genetic, footprinting, modeling and nuclear magnetic resonance studies have shown that this is due to differential binding to different GATA sites within the HGATAR consensus (6,31,50,59,60,65).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%