1993
DOI: 10.1002/cjce.5450710213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The solubility of carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide in a 35 wt% aqueous solution of methyldiethanolamine

Abstract: The solubility of hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide in an aqueous solution containing 35 wt% methyldiethanolamine (MDEA) (3.04 kmol/m3, 4.52 mol/kg) has been measured at 40° and 100°C at partial pressures of the acid gas up to 530 kPa. Some data for hydrogen sulfide in a 50 wt% solution of MDEA (4.38 kmol/m3, 8.39 mol/kg) were also obtained. Also, densities of CO2‐aqueous MDEA solutions were measured at 40°C.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
69
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
9
69
2
Order By: Relevance
“…• Data of Jou et al (1993) in 50 wt % MDEA were not consistent at loadings below 0.05. The trend of a log-log graph of the liquid loading versus H 2 S partial pressure at low loadings should be almost linear and this was not the case for the data of Jou et al (1993).…”
Section: Binary Ionic Interaction Parameters 351 Ionic Interaction mentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…• Data of Jou et al (1993) in 50 wt % MDEA were not consistent at loadings below 0.05. The trend of a log-log graph of the liquid loading versus H 2 S partial pressure at low loadings should be almost linear and this was not the case for the data of Jou et al (1993).…”
Section: Binary Ionic Interaction Parameters 351 Ionic Interaction mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The trend of a log-log graph of the liquid loading versus H 2 S partial pressure at low loadings should be almost linear and this was not the case for the data of Jou et al (1993). There was also a mutual inconsistency seen when Jou's experimental data were compared with experimental data of Lemoine at al.…”
Section: Binary Ionic Interaction Parameters 351 Ionic Interaction mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The data provided by Jou et al [46] and [47] were also omitted from the regression data base due to questionable reliability and also the large deviation from the optimized model (AARD% of 82 and 66, respectively). At 40 C and a MDEA wt% of 50, especially at low pressures, data of Jou et al [46] and [47], deviate from each other and also from Huang and Ng [40] data.…”
Section: Ternary H 2 S-mdea-h 2 O Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And the speed is displayed on the screen of revolution counter. The absorption temperature is measured by a mercurial thermometer (8) with a sensitivity of 0.1°C, which is adjusted by the constant temperature circulating water (14), (15) with a water thermostat. The pressure difference was determined by a glass U-tube manometer (18) with the minimum resolution of 0.1 mmHg (0.013 kPa).…”
Section: Apparatus and Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ordinarily, the known variables are the temperature T, concentration of hydrogen sulfide in the liquid phase x H 2 S , initial molar quantity of solvent components, like MEA, MDEA, PZ and water, by solving the equation set of Eqs. (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14), as well as Eq. (16) …”
Section: Calculation Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%