“…A range of commentators argue that knowledge constructed in accordance with the principles of positivist science reflects the cultural ideologies of those in power (Burman, 1996b; Hare-Mustin and ; Heruiques, Hollway, Urwin, venn and walkerdine, 1984;John, 1998;Kantrowitz and Ballou, 1992: Kitzinger, 1990a; Parker, 1997;Riger, 1992;Stoppard, 1999Stoppard, ,2000Ussher,2000b). Indeed, they illustrate how psychology's use of the 'scientific' in legitimating meaning is deployed to affirm (or negate) certain kinds of knowledge (Baydala, 2001;Hare-Mustin and Marecek, 1997;John, 1998;Kitzinger, 1990a;Larner,2001;stoppard, 1999). In the critical literature, attention is directed at psychology's failure to recognise that all knowledge is discursively produced, and historically, socially, culturally, and politically situated (Burman, 1996b;John, 1998;Nicolson, 1995;Parker, 1997; Ussher,2000b).…”