2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2007.05.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The solid–solid interface: Explaining the high and unique photocatalytic reactivity of TiO2-based nanocomposite materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
131
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 287 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 190 publications
(237 reference statements)
3
131
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We also find that the workfunction of the composite is reduced by around 1 eV compared to the bare surface, which will be important for enhanced reactivity. The importance of forming an interface between two materials 20 to enhance photocatalytic activity is discussed in the literature [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] and new materials combinations are being prepared, e.g. Ismail reported a synthesis of PdO-TiO 2 nanocomposite through one-step sol-gel reaction with enhanced photocatalytic activities 78 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also find that the workfunction of the composite is reduced by around 1 eV compared to the bare surface, which will be important for enhanced reactivity. The importance of forming an interface between two materials 20 to enhance photocatalytic activity is discussed in the literature [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] and new materials combinations are being prepared, e.g. Ismail reported a synthesis of PdO-TiO 2 nanocomposite through one-step sol-gel reaction with enhanced photocatalytic activities 78 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, the brookite phase or anatase-brookite mixed phase is much less studied as a photocatalyst for CO 2 photoreduction, probably due to the previous difficulty in synthesizing high quality brookite nanocrystallites. The studies on pure phase TiO 2 show that anatase phase is more photocatalytically active than rutile, possibly attributed to the combined effect of lower recombination rate of electronhole pairs and higher surface adsorptive capacity (Hurum et al, 2003;Li and Gray, 2007;He et al, 2012). Recently, the much less studied brookite phase was found to have a catalytic activity similar to anatase but higher than rutile for CO 2 photoreduction with H 2 O .…”
Section: Effect Of Crystal Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al [48] contended that adlineation at solid-solid interfaces is one of the most important factors for effective interfacial charge transfer and improved photocatalytic activity. Some researchers [49,50] reported that the conduction band of TiO 2 (A) is about 0.2 eV higher Table 3 Crystallite size, rutile content in the bulk and surface region, and specific surface area of La2O3-TiO2-900 • C samples derived from XRD, UV Raman spectra, and N2-adsorption.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Photocatalytic Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%