2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2008.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The soil organic carbon in particle-size separates under different regrowth forest stands of north eastern Costa Rica

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Neufeldt et al, 2002;Bautista-Cruz and del Castillo, 2005;Davis et al, 2007;Smal and Olszewska, 2008). Controversial conclusions concerning the effects of afforestation on soil C and N pools may be related to various factors, such as climate impacting and spatial heterogeneity (Cao et al, 2010a;Wang and Cao, 2011;Xiong et al, 2014), the years of afforestation (Cao, 2008;Jiménez et al, 2008;Dou et al, 2013), plantation species (Huang et al, 2011;Cao et al, 2011;Tang and Li, 2013), and land use conditions (Xiong et al, 2014). For example, Wang and Cao (2011) have reported that afforestation may initially increase forest cover, but its impact on carbon sequestration may be occasionally negative influence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Neufeldt et al, 2002;Bautista-Cruz and del Castillo, 2005;Davis et al, 2007;Smal and Olszewska, 2008). Controversial conclusions concerning the effects of afforestation on soil C and N pools may be related to various factors, such as climate impacting and spatial heterogeneity (Cao et al, 2010a;Wang and Cao, 2011;Xiong et al, 2014), the years of afforestation (Cao, 2008;Jiménez et al, 2008;Dou et al, 2013), plantation species (Huang et al, 2011;Cao et al, 2011;Tang and Li, 2013), and land use conditions (Xiong et al, 2014). For example, Wang and Cao (2011) have reported that afforestation may initially increase forest cover, but its impact on carbon sequestration may be occasionally negative influence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Accordingly, insights into SOM dynamics in response to afforestation is becoming more imperative at present. However, detecting changes in soil C and N dynamics following afforestation can be difficult, for the SOM consists of a variety of compounds with different microbial degradability and turnover time (John et al, 2005;Jiménez et al, 2008;Rumpel and Kögel-Knabner, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One review of studies in the Neotropics found no overall difference in soil C stocks for secondary forests relative to mature forests, active pastures, or agricultural sites [ Marin‐Spiotta et al ., ]. Similarly, a chronosequence of secondary forests in Costa Rica during 15–60 years of regeneration showed no pattern of change in soil C stocks with forest age, and most differences among sites were related to soil characteristics [ Jimenez et al ., ]. A comparison of soil C across a chronosequence of native species secondary forests in Puerto Rico also showed no difference in soil C stocks across secondary forest ages or pastures [ Marin‐Spiotta et al ., ].…”
Section: Review Of Global Change Effects On Tropical Ecosystemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been many studies on the spatial distribution of SOC, e.g. at local (Jimenez et al, 2008;Jia et al, 2012;Zhang et al, 2013;Wu et al, 2016), regional (Liu et al, 2011;Wang et al, 2015b;Deng & Shangguan, 2016;Willaarts et al, 2016) and global (Jobbágy & Jackson, 2000;Lal, 2004a;Van et al, 2009) scales. However, measurements of SOC in most of these studies are generally limited to the upper 100-cm soil depth, where most SOC is stored (Shi et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%